THE WIZARD OF THE KREMLIN: A NOVEL by Giuliano Da Empoli

Moscow Kremlin

(The Kremlin, Moscow)

Since February 2022 when Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine a plethora of books have been published or reissued that deal with the mindset of Russian President Vladimir Putin.  The most important include works by  Philip Short, Steven Lee Myers, Catherine Belton, Masha Gessen, Mark Galeotti, Owen Matthews, Luke Harding, Christopher Miller, Serhii Plokhy, Angela Stent, Shaun Walker, and Samuel Ramani.  These authors explore Putin’s rise to power, his Pan-Slavism ideology designed to restore the Kremlin to its previous world power status, his domestic agenda, and the reason behind his invasion of Ukraine.  These monographs are works of non-fiction and rely on intensive research that includes interviews with the relevant personages and scouring available documentation to foster insights and critical viewpoints.  Turning to the fictional genre it has a recent addition to this subject matter with the publication of THE WIZARD OF THE KREMLIN: A NOVEL by Giuliano Da Empoli that attempts to explain Putin’s realpolitik and other aspects of his reign employing the format of a novel.

The central character in Da Empoli’s work is Vadim Baranov, a lover of literature, also known as “the wizard of the Kremlin” who was a television producer before becoming Putin’s political advisor.  After fifteen years at Putin’s side, Baranov decides to escape Putin’s grasp and explain the inner workings of the Russian state where Putin’s sycophants and oligarchs battle for the attention of the Russian Tsar.  Russia finds itself in a dark place because of Baranov’s work as the Kremlin “spin doctor.”  Baranov is ensconced in a system he helped create but realizes he must leave – not an easy thing to accomplish in Putin’s Russia.

Russian President Vladimir Putin  at a ceremony to mark the 75th anniversary of Russian Federal Medical-Biological Agency in Moscow on Nov. 9, 2022.

(Russian President, Vladimir Putin)

Da Empoli conveys his story by employing Baranov as a conduit for the narrator of the novel.  The novel opens with an unnamed narrator visiting Moscow to research the early 20th century writer, Yevgeny Zamyatin.  It turns out that Baranov is an admirer of the novelist and through social media the narrator visits Baranov in his remote country house.  As the novel evolves Baranov shares his life story with his visitor moving with energy through Russia in the 1990s to the invasion of Ukraine.

As the Soviet Union comes to an end in 1991 it appears that Russia may be on the verge of some sort of democratic edifice with the end of censorship and a new cultural freedom.  As we know this did not come to pass and Baranov, who resented the new intelligentsia realizes that the future will belong to more practical individuals as a result he will join Putin as a political/media advisor and consummate insider.  In this capacity Da Empoli relates Putin’s rise to power and through dialogue with the Russian autocrat he explains in rather crude form his view of power, how it should be used, and what it can accomplish – the restoration of Russia as a force in the world.

uktrial1118

(Russian oligarch, Boris Berezovsky)

Da Emploi’s fictional account borders on reality as he weaves in historical events and characters into his novel.  We are witnessed to Putin’s actions and reactions to the sinking of a Russian submarine in the Barents Sea in which the entire crew drowned; terrorist attacks by Chechen rebels that some believe was carried out by the FSB; employing Putin’s large labrador in a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, knowing her fear of dogs, among many other examples.  Influential figures appear and reappear.  Oligarchs such as Boris Berezovsky, a billionaire who for a time owned ORT the main Russian television station; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, an opposition activist who had owed Yukos, the largest Russian energy company; Igor Sechin, Putin’s Deputy Chief of Staff and energy issues who would eventually take over Yukos; Yevgeny Prigozhin, a gangster who became Putin’s caterer and eventually opponent, and other important individuals.

(Igor Sechin, Putin’s Chief of Staff)

Da Empoli employs a sarcastic sense of humor and a great deal of irony in carrying out his plot as he compares the old Soviet state to the nouveaux riche of the new Russia.  Through Baranov’s autobiography the author offers interesting comparisons of Joseph Stalin and Putin, and descriptions of Russia in the 1990s when it seemed to be on the cusp of some sort of democracy with the present autocracy.  Da Empoli explains the need of the Russian people for stability and unity after the chaos of the 1990s – for Putin this could only be accomplished through raw power, never admitting an error, appealing to Russian nationalism by calling for a restoration of its Soviet Empire, interfering with the internal mechanism of western democracy, and never giving in to those who oppose him.

The author is right on as he parrots Putin’s critique of Russian docility toward the west under Boris Yeltsin.  As Baranov recounts “our docility called for the harshest punishment.  NATO flooded into the Baltic States, and American military bases into central Asia.  The oversight of financial institutions was no longer sufficient; now they wanted to take power directly.  Send us back to the basement and replace us with agents of the CIA and the International Monetary Fund.  First in Georgia, then in Ukraine, the very heart of our lost Empire.”  For Putin, American actions in Ukrainian elections and its move toward the European Union and NATO was the last straw resulting in the invasion.

The book is ostensibly about cunning and the manipulation of reality as Baranov, a wonderful storyteller that the reader falls under his spell.  Baranov uses his prowess of creating a new reality, a vision of Russian specialness, a new national myth, and cultivates grievances against the west carrying out Putin’s mission.  Da Empoli has created an important character to carry out his novel in Baranov, a cynic who possesses sharp political analysis.  His character is loosely based on Vladislav Surkov, a politician and strategist whose Machiavellian approach to politics made him a perfect advisor for Putin as he accompanied him from St. Petersburg to the Kremlin.  The novel succeeds as a work of fiction, but its origin in reality makes you shudder as you read on.

(The Kremlin, Moscow)

NAPOLEON: A LIFE by Adam Zamoyski

French general and emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

According to British historian Munro Price over 200,000 books have been written about Napoleon Bonaparte.  There is a fascination with the French dictator that historians have addressed for over two centuries, and currently Hollywood has produced its own version of Napoleon.  Today the most recognized biographies of Napoleon are written by British historians that include the three volume work of Michael Broers, and the single volume by Andrew Roberts which approaches 1000 pages.  Obviously, if one is to put pen to paper concerning Napoleon, the result will be a rather long monograph.  One of the latest contributions to the Napoleon genre is by Polish historian, Adam Zamoyski entitled, NAPOLEON: A LIFE though shorter than Roberts’ work by 250 pages it is a comprehensive look at the French leader that digs a little deeper into his thought process and ultimate decision making than previous works.

Zamoyski has written a thorough and workmanlike biography focusing on Napoleon’s personal life, domestic issues and relationships, his ideology, domestic and foreign threats to his reign, along with insights and details pertaining to the battlefield and the diplomatic movements of the period.  In doing so the reader should acquire an intimate knowledge of Napoleon – what made him tick, what was his belief system, and determine his place in history.

François Gérard (1770-1837), Portrait of Josephine de Beauharnais, 1801, oil on canvas,... Josephine Bonaparte’s Gardens at Malmaison

(François Gérard (1770-1837), Portrait of Josephine de Beauharnais, 1801, oil on canvas, 178 x 174 cm/70 x 68.5 in. Hermitage Museum, Russia)

What sets Zamoyski’s work apart is the context that he places his subject.  According to the author Napoleon should be seen as “a visible symptom of the sickness of the times, and as such bore the blame for the sins of all.”  Zamoyski argues that Napoleon did exhibit extraordinary qualities, but in many ways was quite ordinary.  To credit Napoléon as a genius for his many victories, overlooks the worst disaster in military history as he single-handedly destroyed the great enterprise he took years to create. Undoubtedly he was a brilliant tactician, but he was no strategist, as his miserable end attests to.  Further, Zamoyski argues that Napoleon was not an “evil monster.”  He was selfish, violent, and egocentric, but there is no evidence that he inflicted suffering needlessly.  His motives  and ambition are akin to Alexander I, Wellington, Nelson, Metternich, Blucher, Bernadotte and others whose careers adjoined Napoleon.  In addition, if one examines British actions in India, Canada, and Egypt; Austrian measures in Poland and Italy; Prussian activities in East and Central Europe; and Russian movements across Central Asia, one should conclude he was nothing more than the embodiment of his age.  Throughout the monograph Zamoyski develops these themes and integrates a great deal of Napoleon’s personal life and beliefs.

MARIE-LOUISE OF AUSTRIA

(Empress Marie-Louise, by François Gérard 1810 © Louvre Museum)

According to Zamoyski, Napoleon’s Corsican lineage plays a significant role in his emotional development and worldview due to how the French government treated his family and the Corsican people in general.  As the French Revolution evolved into the “Reign of Terror” and the authoritarian rule of the Directory and the European wars that ensued Napoleon learned that the rules of chivalry did not apply, and only winning mattered.  Zamoyski argues that “the dreamy romanticism of his youth had been confronted with the seamy side of human affairs, and at the age of twenty-four he had emerged a cynical realist ready to make his way in the increasingly dangerous world in which he was obliged to live.”

Zamoyski’s portrayal does an excellent job recounting Napoleon’s relationships with Josephine de Beauharnais who he married in 1805 and divorced in 1810, and Marie-Louise, the Habsburg Archduchess who took her place.  The detail is striking, providing insight into Napoleon’s emotional state and his genuine love and caring for both women.  At times Zamoyski goes overboard as he relates Josephine’s numerous affairs and Napoleon’s adolescent love for Marie-Louise. 

Along with the women in his life Napoleon’s family is placed under a microscope, particularly his brothers.  First, Lucien, a rather egoistic individual in his own right who helped Napoleon become First Consul during the Brumaire Coup and then lived his life according to his own needs rather than conforming to his brother’s wishes.  Second, Joseph who believed he should have been the French Emperor, not his brother who reigned in Italy and later made a mess of his rule in Spain – a rather incompetent individual.  Third, Jerome, a total military failure, and lastly, Louis, Napoleon’s favorite who would deal with psychological issues and became king of Holland but angered his brother when he refused to support the Continental system.

Charles Maurice de Talleyrand Périgord (1754–1838), Prince de Bénévent, baron François Gérard (French, Rome 1770–1837 Paris), Oil on canvas

(Charles Maurice de Talleyrand)

A key component in understanding Napoleon’s mindset is his approach to diplomacy which for him was an extension of the battlefield.  Zamoyski’s nimbly account recounts Napoleon’s negotiations and relationships with Austrian Chancellor and former ambassador to France, Klement von Metternich, Russian Tsar, Alexander I, Charles Habsburg, Holy Roman Emperor, and French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand who initially supported Napoleon, but turned against him when he believed the Emperor’s expansionist policies went too far. Zamoyski integrates many other key figures into the monograph that includes lesser royal figures, French generals, Russian, English, Prussian, and Austrian figures.  In reading Zamoyski’s account it conforms to A. J. P. Taylor’s classic THE STRUGGLE FOR THE MASTERY OF EUROPE, 1815-1848.

One can draw many insights from Zamoyski’s analysis as he argues that Napoleon was a dichotomy in that he felt insecure next to the monarchs of Europe because he lacked their “bloodlines,” as he referred to himself as  “parvenue.”  On the other hand, he saw himself as a supreme leader creating his own emperorship defeating the monarchies that he compared himself to.  Zamoyski does a wonderful job describing the Napoleon-Alexander I relationship as the French autocrat had little respect for the Russian monarch but grew to respect him as he ultimately could not bend Alexander to his will despite professions of love and respect.  Other important insights involve the opposition to Napoleon in France from Jacobins and Royalists.  A number of coups are discussed, and it is clear in Napoleon’s mind that the only way to remain popular and maintain domestic support was to keep delivering victories on the battlefield as opposed to obtaining peace.  For Napoleon war was the tool to tamp down unrest in the military and domestic sphere no matter how much opposition he encountered.

(Klement von Metternich)

Zamoyski relies a great deal on previous research particularly, Napoleon’s invasion of Russia.  His decision making and battlefield conduct are laid out clearly as he quotes from his previous book, 1812: NAPOLEON’S FATAL MARCH ON MOSCOW. Particularly interesting is Napoleon’s admission that invading Russia was a grievous error –  a rare confession. One of the highlights of Zamoyski’s work is his reliance on Napoleon’s remarkable correspondence, personal reflections, and notes left by those close to him to create an exceptional portrait of the French Emperor.

(Alexander I)

Zamoyski’s depiction of Napoleon is enhanced as he tackles his domestic program.  The Code de Napoleon, the Concordat with the Papacy, and his educational system are well known, but reflect interests apart from the conduct of war. However, relying on Napoleon’s letters as he describes his cultural interests, his plans for museums, opera houses, wide boulevards and other cultural and architectural projects allowing the reader to acquire a sense of Napoleon’s desires, not only to conquer and spread his “continental system” throughout Europe, but also to encourage and foster intellectual pursuits.

Zamoyski’s achievement in this book is to bring to life Napoleon as a person, not just a military leader, and political ruler.  He describes a man who viewed the world through the lens of a game of chess, and people, religion, morality, affections, and other interests as pawns in a game where pieces needed to be moved and used as the situation called for.  To Zamoyski’s credit his monograph is eminently readable and deeply researched making it an important contribution to  Napoleonic literature.

Jacques-Louis David: The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries

THE FRANCHISE: NEW YORK RANGERS, A CURATED HISTORY OF THE BLUESHIRTS by Rick Carpiniello

NCAA HOCKEY: JAN 11 Rivalry on Ice - Yale v Harvard

In the spring of 1994 Howie Rose’s call of Stephane Matteau’s game winning goal against the New Jersey Devils sent the New York Rangers to the finals for the Stanley Cup.   This would end the Blueshirts 54 year drought and was music to every tortured Ranger fan’s ears.  The season and playoff run were magical, but it would lead to another drought now reaching three decades.  For Ranger fans who lost the finals to the Los Angeles Kings in 2014, it has been a rough go, but the history of the organization has improved over the last few seasons, and many believe or hope that this could be the year that the Rangers hoist the Cup once again.  

Rick Carpiniello, a sports reporter for THE JOURNAL and THE ATHLETIC  from 1978 to 2021 new book THE FRANCHISE: NEW YORK RANGERS. A CURATED HISTORY OF THE BLUESHIRTS brings hockey to the forefront through a series of wonderfully reported essays about the organization’s championship close calls throughout the 1970s, finally winning the Cup in 1994, and its decline until the emergence of Henrik Lundqvist as the team’s goalie in  2012,  Carpiniello’s monograph is based on intimate knowledge of the franchise forged through extensive relations with the players, coaches, and other members of the organization.

Captain Mark Messier receives the Stanley Cup after the Rang

(1993-94 season the New York Rangers win the Stanley Cup)

Perhaps the most interesting aspects of Carpiniello’s book are his character studies ranging from Rangers General Manager and Coach Fred Shero, flamboyant winger, Ron Duguay to current players like Norris Trophy Winger Adam Fox and Chris Kreider.  In each instance Carpiniello reaches for entertaining quotes, player opinions of different teams and players, team bonding, and the outrageous actions of different personalities.

Carpiniello begins with the famous 1978-9 season tease when it appeared the Rangers might finally break the curse that dated to 1940.  They had defeated the dreaded New York Islanders in a series that created the chant Ranger fans employ to this day of “Potvin sucks.”  However, despite defeating the Montreal Canadiens in the first game of the Stanley Cup finals, they went on to lose four straight providing Les Canadiens their fourth consecutive finals victory.

The author is right on as he describes the “disorganization of the organization” in the 1980s.  Ownership had opportunities to trade for Wayne Gretzky and Mark Messier much earlier than they finally did and refused.  They hired a series of general managers and coaches who either did not fit the profile of their jobs and made decisions which in many cases are hard to fathom.  Herb Brooks, the 1980 Olympic coach was a failure, Ted Sator was in over his head, Michel Bergeron was a bust, and Hall of Famer Phil Esposito, also known as “trader Phil,” made a series of poor trades and his record as a coach was not much better.  The key person was Craig Patrick who was a GM and coach but was gone by the late 1980s but drafted the likes of Brian Leetch and Mike Richter.  The savior of the 1980s was John Vanbiesbrouck, an excellent goalie who was in large part responsible for the few Ranger successes during the decade.    

New York Rangers vs New Jersey Devils

(Ranger defenseman Brian Leetch)

Carpiniello has a knack in developing stories about some interesting/flamboyant characters  in his narrative.  Names like Tie Domi, Joey Kocur, Ulf Samuelsson, perhaps the dirtiest player in hockey at the time, and Jeff Beukeboom come to mind. All were fighters, who had talented upside.  Other key personalities that the author weaves in and out of this monograph are Neil Smith, the GM who traded for Mark Messier and signed free agent Sadam Graves.  Smith would put together the team that finally won the cup under Mike Kennan’s leadership.  Kennan became head coach, when then coach Roger Neilson, another interesting personality could not get along with Messier and was fired.

Adam Graves New York Rangers Autographed Game Action 8x10 Photo

(Ranger wing Adam Graves)

Carpiniello brings back many forgotten memories.  A few that stand out include the switch in approach under Craig Patrick in the early 1980s from a mean fighting mentality to a skilled group of young players who were not large in stature nicknamed “the Smurfs.”   Another important individual was Mike Kennan, a hard ass, controversial coach who upon arriving at MSG felt the Rangers were a soft team.  Kennan immediately pushed to trade certain “soft” players who would go on to have tremendous careers with other teams.  Names like Mike Gartner, Tony Almonte, Darren Turcotte, and James Patrick come to mind.  No matter how much talent Kennan forced Smith to get rid of for second line players, in the end he molded the team by blending their talent and finally ending the “1940 chorus.”  Despite his success, Kennan was seen as a “bastard” held beyond contempt by many in the Ranger organization.  But, one must keep in mind it was Kennan who pushed Smith to acquire grinders like Matteau, Brian Noonan, and a bunch of Edmonton Oiler Stanley Cup champions.  

  • HENRIK LUNDQVIST NEW YORK RANGERS 8X10 SPORTS ACTION PHOTO (Y)
  • (Ranger goalie”King” Henrik Lundquist)

The book recounts the magical playoff run that culminated in winning the cup with wonderful anecdotes and player stories.  I remember exactly where I was the night they won and as many others have said “I can now die in peace!”  However, it was a short dynasty as a new curse and/or drought began the next season which carries on to this day.  To Carpiniello’s credit is description of the players, their talent and foibles for the next three decades is remarkable, and all I can say is god bless his memory! 

The post-Cup period saw the arrival of Wayne Gretzky, but at the same time they let Messier go.  Carpiniello is correct in describing the Ranger’s biggest problem as management as MSG president Dave Checketts who was in charge of the Knicks and Rangers knew nothing about hockey and it showed in his decision making.

Carpiniello digs deep into the second drought and the role of Glen Sather as GM and coach.  Sather who built the Edmonton Oilers would eventually be successful with the Rangers, but not until he finally made the correct draft and trade decisions, particularly a 7th round pick named Henrik Lundqvist who would backstop the team in goal for well over a decade beginning in the 2004-05 season.  During this period fascinating new characters came on the scene, particularly emblematic is Carpiniello’s description of John Tortorella, which is priceless.  The turnaround for the Rangers came in 2010-11 and from then on they were a sound playoff team which flirted with a cup run in 2013-14.

Chris Kreider Cam Talbot NY Rangers Wallpaper

(Ranger wing Chris Kreider)

At times, the author becomes emotional about certain players and events.  Perhaps the most poignant coverage deals with 9/11 and the reaction of the players and how they interacted with first responders and New Yorkers in general.   This aspect of the book reflects the wonderful working relationship that the author had with Ranger players.

In the latter part of the book Carpiniello zeroes in on two of the most important and creative approaches taken by the Ranger front office that coincided with a decline in the career of Henrik Lundquist.  After a successful run from the 2008-09 season to the 2013-14 Cup final season the team went through its famous rebuild  underscored by “the letter” to fans explaining the course the organization was about to take.  New leadership came aboard that included John Davidson as President, Jeff Gorton as GM, and David Quinn as coach.  Through a series of trades, i.e., acquiring Jacob Trouba, Ryan Lindgren, Mika Zibanejad, and  Adam Fox; signing free agents, i.e., Artemi Panarin; resigning Chris Kreider, and significant draft choices like K’Andre Miller and Igor Shesterkin the foundation was set for the current Ranger Roster.  When the rebuild did not progress as fast as he wanted, the impulsive Ranger owner, Dolan fired the three men who was responsible for the rebuild in large part to the machinations and violence perpetrated by Washington Capitals Tom Wilson, and brought in an entire new leadership team.

(Ranger wing Artemi Panarin, “the breadman!”

Overall, the book is a wonderful stroll down memory lane for Ranger fans with Carpiniello integrating wonderful vignettes, personal insights and observations which reflect a sense of humor, vast hockey knowledge, and a writing style that is easy to read.  If there is one negative in Carpiniello’s approach, at times his narrative comes across as somewhat disjointed as many of his stories and observations lack cohesiveness.  However, despite this minor criticism, the book is a wonderful gift for all Ranger fans.            

New York City Economy

                                      

THE ARMOR OF LIGHT by Ken Follett

British factory

(Early 19th century British factory)

For those devotees of Ken Follett’s Kingsbridge series his latest addition will not disappoint.  His new book, THE ARMOR OF LIGHT is the fifth novel in the series and contains elements from earlier Kingsbridge works.  It follows ordinary working people whose lives were altered by historical crises.  Follett introduces inventors that change history and have profound impact on everyone.  Further, it presents the battle for freedom as people fight for lives free of oppression and lastly, Follett develops impactful female characters who play significant roles in the flow of the novel.

Follett is a master storyteller who has a firm grip on historical detail.  The current storyline is set during the Industrial Revolution and relates the tale of a group of intertwined families whose lives are greatly impacted by mechanical and technological change.  Follett’s characters are involved in food riots, worker strikes, and resistance to forced military service.  The English Parliament responds with a series of repressive laws making it a crime to speak out against the government.

The story’s background focuses on the year 1792 amidst what English historian, Eric Hobsbawm describes as the Age of Revolution.  Highlighted by the dual revolutions of industry and ideology in France that commenced in 1789 the story proceeds to the Age of Napoleon as the French dictator launches a series of wars across Europe that will culminate by 1814 with the Congress of Vienna.  The story continues for another ten years with the story concluding in 1824.

(A hand loom weaving)

Follett’s mythical village of Kingsbridge is a center of textile production where work is moving from piece work at home to mills equipped with more productive machinery.  In addition to being forced to work in pseudo-factories, labor must deal with inflation induced by war and a government that is cracking down on dissent.  The propertied classes take advantage of the situation as they control Parliament and make it difficult for workers to unite resulting in low wages, dangerous working conditions, and poor housing.

The story accurately rehashes the plight of English workers at the turn of the 19th century and their relationship with the new industrial aristocracy fostered by the mechanization of the industrial revolution.  Follett depicts many scenes that correctly replicate historical events.  From attempts at unionization of weavers to government institution of laws preventing workers from combining; the effects of decades of war with France resulting in increasing inflation and poverty for the masses; action and results from the battlefield; the arrest and prosecution of the poor, even hanging a seven year old boy; the press gang of the poor into the Royal navy; the fears of the gentry first, the French Revolution and later the machinations of Napoleon are just a few themes that Follett develops.

(Rioting mob of Luddites)

Of course, as in any of Follett’s historical novels there are a series of characters, some heroes, others villains.  Among those who stand out are Sal Clitheroe and her son Kit.  Sal’s husband dies and she remarries and becomes a leader in trying to organize the weavers.  Jarge Box, Sal’s second husband, a laborer with a temper who loved his wife.  Amos Barrowfield, a clothier who begins engaging in the “putting out” system and graduates to owning his own mills as the novel progresses.  He is in love with a woman he cannot have, and of course there is another woman who is in love with him who he rejects.  The Riddick brothers.  Will who is a self-absorbed nasty person who is also a crook.  Roger, a mechanical genius who supports the workers, lastly, George, who is the Rector of Bradford.  A key individual is David Shoveller, known as Spade, a generous and caring person who works with Sal to help the plight of the poor.  Arabella Latimer, married to the Bishop of Kingsbridge who she deplores and eventually has an affair, a child, and a new marriage!  Henry Viscount of Northwood, a soldier who is married to Elsie, Arabella’s daughter, is also married to a man she does not love and cannot have the man she desires.

As far as villains are concerned we can generalize and state it is the English Parliament, judicial system, monarchy, and the British aristocracy for the most part lacks any empathy for its workers and subjects in general.  It is highlighted by the policies of Prime Minister William Pitt and others who occupied the office.  As for individuals that Follett carefully develops, Alderman Joseph Hornbean stands out as a person who survived extreme poverty as a child including the witnessing of the hanging of his mother.  He goes on to become a very rich and influential mill owner with under the table contracts with the English military to supply uniforms.  He opposes all progress except machines that will make him even wealthier.  Arrest, trials, bribery, hangings are all aspects of things that he is ultimately responsible for.  There are many others that Follett introduces, and he is very successful in developing their personalities and their impact on the evolution of the novel.

Industrial Landscape by Kregczy

(The impact of the Industrial Revolution)

The story is constructed chronologically, and it follows the course of the wars of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars.  Follett has excellent command of the war’s progression and its impact on British society, especially the working poor.  The lifestyle of the aristocratic households is deftly compared to that of the underclass and how certain characters strive for inclusion with the upper classes.  Follett develops a number of important themes, the foremost of which is the precarious nature of work for the poor as mechanization threatens the loss of their livelihood.  Other themes include the schism between Anglicanism and Methodism. In addition, the aristocracy’s fear of the ecumenical revolution fostered by the French and a possible invasion of Britain by Napoleon which would destroy their way of life, and the fear of mill owners of the Luddites who were crossing the country smashing machines.   This is highlighted by the growth of a number of characters highlighted by Sal as she overcomes widowhood to become a leader and spokesperson of the poor and Amos and Spade as they leave their comfort level to take on more responsibility and leadership in Kingsbridge.

Coal Pits & Factories

(Coal pits and factories)

THE ARMOR OF LIGHT continues Follett’s remarkable success that began thirty-four years ago with the publication of THE PILLARS OF THE EARTH.  Over the decades the series has sold over 27 million copies stunning readers and critics with its rich detail, amazing architectural research, and brilliant storytelling.  THE ARMOR OF LIGHT is written with the author’s gift for personal and political drama creating a story that moves gratifyingly through over 700 pages.  It is so engrossing that you might want to return to the earlier volumes, the first of which appeared in 2007 presenting a saga that covers 800 years and well over 4,000 pages.

As one reads on and you are as Katherine Powers writes in her Washington Post review,  “propelled by acts of highhanded cruelty answered by the resourcefulness and pluck of its victims, a dynamic so predictable that we know that, in most cases, it’s only a matter of time before good triumphs and comeuppance is delivered — whereupon the cycle repeats itself. Yes, we’re being manipulated, but we can’t stop turning the pages: What now? What next? Beyond that, however, it is Follett’s generosity and adeptness with historical detail and nimble depictions of technical matters that set this book, like its predecessors, above mere historical melodrama.”

(Early 19th century British Factory)

BOMBER by Len Deighton

(British Lancaster Bomber)

The bombing of civilians during wartime and the concept of “collective guilt;” particularly today with events in Gaza is very controversial.  The moral dilemma and the psychological component are aptly portrayed in Kurt Vonnegut’s work, SLAUGHTERHOUSE FIVE as well as in non-fiction offerings such as historians Richard Overy’s THE BOMBERS AND THE BOMBED: ALLIED AIRWAR OVER EUROPE, 1940-1945; Frederick Taylor’s  DRESDEN: TUESDAY FEBRUARY 13, 1945, AND COVENTRY NOVEMBER 14, 1940; Jorg Friedrich’s THE BOMBING OF GERMANY 1940-1945; and Keith Lowe’s INFERNO:THE FIERY DESTRUCTION OF HAMBURG 1943.  These accounts are accurate and extremely impactful.

Four decades ago, probably the most precise novel dealing with the air war over Germany was Len Deighton’s BOMBER.  The book has recently been reissued depicting an RAF Squadron in devastating detail over a 24 hour period, June 31, 1943, a date the author created.  It focuses on an RAF attack on a German city of Krefeld that went wrong resulting in the bombing of the village of Altgarten and the German pilots who met them in the air.

The main characters are RAF pilot, Sergeant Sam Lambert, one of England’s best pilots, and German ace, Oberleutnant Baron Victor von Lowenherz.  Deighton develops these fictional characters very carefully integrating their private lives, members of their squad, and their views about the war.  Deighton’s detail is exceptional, from the Operations room, mental and mechanical preparations of the pilots, strategies, aircraft design and capabilities.  Deighton goes as far as charting the arc of survival for pilots based on the number of missions flown, in addition to factoring the cost of each bomber that was launched on June 31.  In all areas the author’s diligence and knowledge of air campaigns is remarkable as is his precise depictions of planes, weapons, and behind the scenes war strategy.

(British bombing of Hamburg, 1943)

Deighton does well in creating background biographies for all the major characters he introduces which provides insight into their emotions and reactions to the war, air combat preparations, and human relationships. A number stand out including Sergeant Simon Cohen, Flight Sergeants Battersby and Digby all members of Lambert’s squad.  Christian Himmel, a twenty-two year old experienced German pilot who steals and leaks information concerning “freezing” experiments of Jews at Dachau to assist German aviators who were shot down in freezing climates.  Flight Lieutenant Sweet, Commander of Lambert’s group who believes his underling is too pro-communist.  Johannes Iif, a fireman in Altgarten who experienced the fire-bombing of Cologne, an anti-Nazi who was an expert on British ordinance. Gerd Boll and Oberzugtuhrer Bodo Reuter who were in charge of damage control in Altgarten after the waves of British attack planes.  Luftwaffe Oberleutnant August Bach, commander of radar station “Ermine” who falls in love with his young housekeeper.  Willi Reinecke, Bach’s second in command, and lastly, Hansil, a German boy in the small market town of Altgarten.  There are numerous other characters who scheme, plot, fall in love, and experience life as normally as possible based on their situation.  Deighton creates an  enormous cast that includes airmen, soldiers, firemen, nurses, doctors, wives and civilians of all descriptions which lends itself to an intricate plot despite the fact that the story is developed within the confines of one day.

(British bombing of Dresden, 1943)

The author makes many insightful observations.  First, the social class component involving aviators and those that work with them.  Certain characters find it abhorrent that bakers, miners, milkmen, firemen, etc. can become pilots.  These individuals cannot accept the ranks members of the “lower class” achieve but are forced to work with them.  Deighton continuously points to the experiences of German soldiers and aviators on the eastern front which creates a great deal of sarcasm and anti-Nazi commentary among those who survived Stalin’s armies.  He points out correctly that Hitler was running out of soldiers and teenagers from the Hitlergund were forced to fight in combat roles.  There are also observations pertaining to pilot attitudes toward the rear echelon bureaucrats who made strategic decisions far from the air war provoking aviator anger.  The pettiness of certain individuals is clear, i.e.; trying to force Lambert’s wife, Ruth to convince her husband to play cricket for the company team or he would be prosecuted for supposed leftist views.  These are just a few insights, there are many more.

Deighton compares Krefeld, the German city, which was the original target of RAF planes, a city known for heavy industry, textiles, light industry, communications in the Ruhr Valley, and Altgarten, the unfortunate victim of RAF error, a sleepy village made up of mostly wooden structures with no wartime industry.  As the 700 RAF planes are launched, Deighton focuses on the arial combat in a realistic fashion.  However, the German pilots are not able to prevent the disaster that was about to fall on the small German village.  Throughout the aerial scenes that Deighton develops, realism is the key allowing the reader to feel that they are aboard RAF or Luftwaffe aircraft.

The British strategy to send hundreds of planes, night after night, to bomb the civilian areas of German cities was based on the decisions of Arthur Harris, head of the RAF Bomber Command.  As Malcom Gladwell writes in his review of the reissuance of BOMBER; “Harris was resolutely unsentimental about his decision. He once wrote that it “should be unambiguously stated” that the RAF’s goal was “the destruction of German cities, the killing of German workers, and the disruption of civilized life throughout Germany … the destruction of houses, public utilities, transport and lives, the creation of a refugee problem on an unprecedented scale.” His nickname was “Butcher” Harris, a sobriquet employed with a certain grudging respect, on the understanding that butchers can be useful in times of war. Harris was a psychopath. Twenty-five thousand people in Cologne once burned to death, in one night, on his orders.” According to British novelist Vera Brittain the people of England acquiesced to his decision because they did not have the imagination to appreciate what those deadly bombing campaigns meant to those on the ground.*

I agree with Gladwell that Deighton’s BOMBER is perhaps the greatest antiwar novels that has  been written.  It may come across as a bit dated, but in reality it is a superb account of aerial combat and the people whose lives depended upon it.  For the author one of his goals was to convey the dehumanizing effects of mechanical warfare, a goal he clearly achieved.

*Malcom Gladwell, “Bomber” is one of the Greatest British antiwar novels ever written,” Wsahington Post, August 18, 2023.

BLOOD AND IRON: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 1871-1918 by Katja Hoyer

(German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck)

It might surprise most of you that Germany has only been a country since 1871.  By the mid-19th century Germany was a series of states, thirty nine to be exact.  The dominant principalities were Prussia and Bavaria, one dominated the Lutheran north, the other the Catholic south.  The question must be asked, how was it unified?  Many argue it was the work of the eventual German Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck whose brilliant realpolitik fostered wars with Denmark, Austria, culminating with the unification of the north and south through war with France.  Another important question revolves around the idea that Germany was unified because of Bismarck’s brilliance and his opponents in other countries/kingdoms were not exceptional intellects, particularly King Louis Napoleon III.  Did Bismarck lure his foreign opponents into wars, creating a nationalist movement that gave the Chancellor the opportunity to use Prussia as the cudgel to bring about the new country. 

If one has read the works of Otto Pflanze, Jonathan Steinberg, or A.J.P. Taylor it is clear that Bismarck learned an important lesson during the Revolutions of 1848 – Germany could not be unified from below – it had to be unified from above, superimposing Prussia on the rest of the German states.  It is obvious that the unification of Germany was a complex endeavor that engenders many questions, and it lends itself to an important book by Katja Hoyer, a German-British historian entitled, BLOOD AND IRON: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 1871-1918.

Photograph of an elderly Wilhelm, a bald man with side whiskers

(German Emperor Wilhelm I)

Hoyer does an excellent job of synthesis as she tackles “the Second Reich” under Wilhem I through his grandson, Wilhelm II in this short volume.  Do not let its length take away from Hoyer’s incisive analysis as she explains how Germany was unified, then remarkably how Bismarck decided that after unification, Germany was satiated and turned to domestic issues and away from further foreign wars.  He resorted to diplomacy by isolating France through a series of alliances and stole the socialist domestic thunder by adopting some of their programs.  Further, he did not want to get involved in the imperialist race for colonies since Germany’s creation had upended the European balance of power; he did not want to create enemies that would lead to war.  Hoyer argues correctly that once Bismarck passed from the scene in 1888, Wilhelm II would negate the Bismarckian realpolitik for a much more aggressive foreign policy which would eventually lead to the events of August 1914 and four years later Germany’s defeat in World War I.

Despite the fact that Hoyer’s monograph is only 239 pages, it is crammed with historical assessments, personality analysis, and a deep dive into the cause and effect of important events.  Hoyer displays a firm knowledge of sources and writes in an easy style that allows a clear understanding of information that at times can be dense.  The author offers many interesting points that seem off the beaten track, but in reality impact the course of German history.  A case in point is her discussion of the Grimm brother’s fairy tales and its impact on the unity of German culture.  Others include the relationship between Kaiser Wilhelm I, his son Friedrich III, and Wilhelm II, the Kaiser’s grandson.  The Kaiser tried to stay in the background and let Bismarck lead, Friedrich who died after 99 days on the throne was much more liberal than his father, and his son Wilhelm II was an aggressive and insecure man who would lead Germany to ruin.

File:Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany - 1902.jpg

(German Emperor Wilhelm II)

Hoyer carefully explains the rise of Otto von Bismarck and his relationship with Wilhelm I.  She examines his approach to domestic and foreign policy, and it is clear from her presentation that Bismarck was far more competent than anyone he dealt with as he manipulated people and events to achieve his goals.  She vociferously argues against the idea that there is a straight line in German history between Bismarck and Adolf Hitler.  She continues stating the Bismarckian system was inherently flawed, but it did not set Germany upon the inevitable path to war and genocide.  Bismarck was aware how the unity of the German states threatened the European balance of power after 1871 and was very careful not to create situations that would foster foreign intervention into German affairs.  Obviously, Bismarck used war as a political tool, but once his goals were achieved he turned more to protect unification and deal with domestic issues like the perceived socialist and Catholic threats, resulting in social legislation and the Kulturkampf which was a response to Papal overreach.

The key figure apart from Bismarck in Hoyer’s rendition of German history is Wilhelm II who saw himself as another Frederick Barbarossa who would lead Germany’s return to greatness.  According to Hoyer, Wilhelm II saw no need for Chancellors, Ministers, or political realities to mitigate his power, which was an unworkable concept at the turn of the century which only became apparent to him when it was already too late.  Wilhelm II had no comprehension of the complexity of Bismarck’s schemes in domestic and foreign affairs that held Germany together and allowed it to prosper. Despite his succumbing to flattery from certain officials resulting in cunning manipulation, feelings of insecurity, and his rejection of republicans and liberals his belief in the glory of Germany which deserved its rightful place in the world power structure was very popular with the German people.  The belief in authoritarianism and militarism is supported by a wonderful vignette dealing with an unemployed cobbler named Wilhelm Frederick Voight who acquired military costumes, dressed up as an officer and ordered soldiers and officials around as he seized Berlin City Hall with no one questioning his actions – according to Hoyer, a response to the uniform, highlighting German respect for authoritarianism and militarism.

gwimage274

(German soldiers in the trenches of World War I)

Hoyer is on point as she argues that for disparate Germans to come together they needed a sense of the common enemy, further she argues “the system fell because it was flawed from the outset, built on foundations of war, not fraternity.”  German historian Gerard DeGroot’s review sums up well what an effective job Hoyer has done; “There’s nothing particularly new in this assessment. The most impressive feature of this book is not its thesis but its brevity. Until now, I didn’t realize that it was possible to write a short book about Germany. Succinctness is an impressive and sadly undervalued quality in an author. A strict word count is a cruel tyrant; difficult decisions about what goes in have to be made and creativity inevitably curtailed. Hoyer nevertheless manages to pepper her trim narrative with some lovely frills. The mark of a really good short book is its ability to inspire curiosity. “Blood and Iron” achieves just that.  Careless historians often draw a straight line from Bismarck to Hitler. That, Hoyer argues, is “simplistic.” There’s much to admire in what Bismarck created and Wilhelm ruined. Important elements of the Second Reich survive in today’s Germany, a nation widely respected as stable, mature and responsible. What this story reveals is how easily governmental institutions can be destroyed when people are led astray by intoxicating notions of a place in the sun. That, perhaps, is a lesson for us all.”*

  • DeGroot, Gerard. “One Man, Three Wars, and the Creation of Germany,” Washington Post. January 7, 2022.
Wall Art - Photograph - Untitled 64 by © Ken Welsh

DAMASCUS STATION by David McCloskey

Syrian pro-government demonstrators gather in a central square in Damascus to support Assad

(Syrian pro-government demonstrators gather in a central square in Damascus to show their support for Bashar al-Assad’s rule)

At the time of this writing the Middle East is on the precipice of a wider war resulting from the blood stained conflict that exists in the Gaza Strip where retribution and vengeance dominates.  Last week, the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas unleashed a horror laden attack on Israel and the Netanyahu government responded in kind.  The result has been the utter destruction of the Gazan infrastructure, another example of how Hamas uses the Palestinian people as pawns in their war against Israel causing the deaths of thousands of their co-religionists and the maiming of others.  Hamas claims to be the defender of the Palestinian people, but their modus operandi does not match their rhetoric.

The current fighting mirrors the bloody civil war that occurred in Syria as opposition forces spurred on by the Arab Spring in 2011 tried to overthrow the repressive regime of Bashir Assad who used every weapon including chemical weapons and Russian barrel bombs to cling to power.  The conflict spawned a number of different radical Islamic groups that sought his overthrow including the Islamic State (ISIS).  The civil war that resulted brought in Russian and American troops and produced the deaths of thousands of Syrian casualties and millions of refugees dispersed to Turkey, Jordan, and other countries.  Events from the early years of the Syrian Civil War form the backdrop of David McCloskey, a former Middle East CIA operative’s first novel, DAMASCUS STATION.

Al-Kindi hospital in Aleppo

(al-Kindi hospital, Aleppo. Above in 2012 and below in 2013)

According to the author, the novel is a work of fiction that takes its inspiration from actual events that took place between 2011 and 2013 that evolved into a long drawn out civil war as insurgents buoyed by the Arab Spring sought to remove the Assad Dynasty that had ruled Syria for over five decades.

We immediately meet Sam Joseph, a CIA officer who is in Damascus to assist in the exfiltration of an asset from Syria.  KOMODO, a mid-level scientist at the complex responsible for Assad’s chemical weapons program, and her handler Val Owens are trying to navigate Damascus and its environs between Assad and rebel forces.  Unfortunately, Owens will be murdered by Syrian security forces changing the flow of the novel as the CIA, in particular, Sam Joseph, wants revenge.  The novel coalesces around Joseph as he has three main goals.  First, exact revenge against Ali Hassan who killed Owens.  Second, recruit an asset in the Syrian national security structure named Mariam Haddad.  Lastly, locate the sarin gas that the Assad government has moved in order to go beyond President Obama’s red line.

McCloskey has authored a remarkable novel as he navigates the intelligence community.  His approach is one of realism as he integrates aspects of the spy culture throughout.  The reader will become fascinated as McCloskey’s characters model actual CIA training, techniques, op preparation, and mission implementation.  We are instructed about dead drops, surveillance, technology, and plain human intelligence.  We are also introduced to a series of important characters such as Rustum Hassan, the leader of the Syrian Revolutionary Guard who has no compunction about killing, including thousands of victims in the Syrian Civil War.  Ali Hassan, Rustum’s younger brother who he hates is in conflict over their place in Bashar al-Assad governmental hierarchy.  Bouthaina Najjar, an advisor to Assad, and Rustum’s lover.  Basil Mahkluf, in charge of the Revolutionary Guard’s missile and rocket program.  Jamil Atiyah, an Assad henchman, a pedophile with profound influence.  Sam Joseph, the CIA operative who makes the cardinal error by falling in love with an asset.  The BANDITOS, Rami, Yusuf and Elias, the Kassab triplets who run surveillance for Joseph.  Artemis Aphrodite Proctor, the saucy Damascus station chief.  Ed Bradley, who oversaw Syrian operations from the Directorate of Operations.  Mariam Haddad, a midlevel analyst who is recruited by Joseph and flips.  Abu Qasim, rebel leader and bomb maker and his wife Sarya, a sniper with 142 kills.  Lastly, General Volkov sent by Moscow to assist the Syrians in rooting out CIA spies in Damascus.

A street in Homs, Syria in 2011 and 2014

(A street in Homs, in 2011 (above) and 2014)

McCloskey develops his characters very carefully.  He describes what led Abu Qasim to turn against the Assad regime and the issues and players involved in the bloody carnage of the Syrian Civil War.  The author takes a deep dive into the Syrian regime, how it operated and how an individual went about surviving the internal paranoia of serving in Assad’s government.  McCloskey takes the reader inside the Syrian Mukhabarat, the secret police whose who employ torture, beatings, coercing family members etc. to achieve their aims. 

Sarin gas plays a key role in the story.  Once its location is discovered and moved Joseph must locate the new site at the same time the Mukhabarat is after him.  McCloskey describes how the gas is developed, produced, and weaponized for a trial attack against a Syrian rebel village and getting it ready for a larger statement against rebel forces.  McCloskey also explores the American process in fighting the Syrian forces highlighting President Obama’s approach to the Civil War.

Omari Mosque in Deraa

(Omari mosque in Deraa. Above in 2011 and below in 2013)

The author’s expertise is on full display as he describes Joseph’s thought process while being surveilled.  Joseph analyzes his own undertaking relative to the Russian/Syrian team that watched his every movement as he prolonged the chase for hours as he was trained.  For Joseph, “he could sense the hunters out there,” during this cat and mouse game – except it was no game.

Joseph’s relationship with Mariam is complex as she felt guilty about what happened to her anti-Assad cousin Razan, her betrayal of Joseph, and killing three Mukhabarat.   McCloskey tries to make his characters feel like any one of us, but in reality they are tasked to serve and protect the United States and help US policymakers understand the region and the implications of certain events.

Overall, it is an authentic spy thriller set in the tumultuous Middle East that should keep the reader on the edge of their seats.  Former CIA Directors Leon Panetta and David Petraeus praise the “realistic portrayal of CIA operations overseas” and that is good enough for me.

Supporters of President Bashar al-Assad carried his portrait during a demonstration in Damascus on Monday, the day after the Arab League imposed sanctions.

(Supporters of President Bashar al-Assad carried his portrait during a demonstration in Damascus on Monday, the day after the Arab League imposed sanctions)

COLLISION OF POWER: TRUMP, BEZOS, AND THE WASHINGTON POST by Martin Baron

US-INTERNET-MEDIA-TAKEOVER-AMAZON-WASHINGTONPOST

What do you do when your new boss is the richest man in the world, and he has just purchased your place of employment?  This is the situation that Martin Baron, then the executive editor of the Washington Post found himself seven months into his new position in 2013.  His new boss was Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon which created an arrangement conducive to a great deal of pressure, and to exacerbate the situation further, Donald Trump announces for president in 2015 and by 2017 resides in the White House.  Trump heightens Baron’s angst as he wages a war of unprecedented vitriol and vengeance against Bezos personally and the media, especially the Washington Post.  The period 2013 to 2021 forms the time frame of Baron’s new memoir/history of the period, COLLISION OF POWER: TRUMP, BEZOS, AND THE WASHINGTON POST.

Baron’s book is much more than a rehashing of Trump’s war against Bezos and Amazon/Washington Post.  It is a well thought out and incisive examination of a career in newspaper publishing, particularly Baron’s role as executive editor at the newspaper.  Baron who had spent nearly twelve years leading the Boston Globe, recounts how he managed the Post’s newsroom and dealt with issues ranging from domestic surveillance, the #metoo movement, vetting Supreme Court candidates, to the myriad of scandals and crisis’ that surrounded Trump, the individual in addition to his administration, two impeachment trials, an insurrection, navigating internal issues at the newspaper, in addition to the comparisons between the Post and New York Times.

When Martin Baron took the took job at The Washington Post in 2013, the company was struggling to survive. Then The Post was sold and it began to expand.

(Martin Baron, author)

It is clear from the outset that the Washington Post was a target of Trump’s.  The newspaper coverage of him personally and his campaign angered him, and he leaned on Jeff Bezos to get Baron’s newsroom to back off with their criticism which would continue after he was elected president.

Baron begins his memoir by explaining the background as to how Bezos came to buy the Washington Post.  As the narrative continues it is clear that Baron likes and respects Bezos as he believes in the essential role of journalism in a democracy as the reason he purchased the paper.  Further, Baron argues that Bezos never interfered with the paper’s coverage of Amazon, his affair and divorce, and never used his position to spread his influence.  Bezos relished the challenge of turning the paper around and moving it into the digital age.  Bezos’ greatest concern was whether his strategy of “shifting from relatively few subscribers paying a lot for a subscriptions to lots of subscribers paying fairly little for digital subscriptions – would actually work.”  Baron reviews Bezos’ approach to management and the numerous changes he implemented, i.e.; to create a nation/worldwide network of journalists who would be a free-lance force.  For Bezos it would expand the journalistic reach of the paper at “bargain basement prices.”

Martin Baron, left, and Jeff Bezos in 2016. After Mr. Bezos bought The Post in 2013, Mr. Baron had more resources and sought a bigger digital audience.

(Martin Baron, left, and Jeff Bezos in 2016. After Mr. Bezos bought The Post in 2013, Mr. Baron had more resources and sought a bigger digital audience).

As one reads on, Baron rehashes the nightmare of the Trump presidency, his refusal to accept the fact he lost the 2020 election, and the events surrounding January 6th.  There is little that is new here though the emphasis is on Trump’s obsession with Amazon which he believed manipulated newspaper coverage of him personally.  Since he blamed the Washington Post for unfair criticism he went after the retail behemoth arguing it paid no taxes, it was ripping off the US Postal system, and it engaged in unfair trade practices.  To Baron’s credit when coverage of Trump did not meet the Post’s standards he refused to publish.  A good example is his handling of the Steele Dossier that accused Trump of election cooperation with Russian interference in 2016, sexual proclivities, the attempt to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, and his relationship with Vladimir Putin.  In the end the document developed by a former British spy did not meet the standard the paper relied on for publication.  No matter what the coverage of Trump, Baron points out in his war against the media “any questions that put him on the spot was an offense.”

Baron’s chapter dealing with the death of Jamal Khashoggi is important as it highlights Trump and his allies’ war on journalists.  It is clear that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was culpable in his death, and it is interesting how Baron creates links between the Saudi leadership’s approach to critical journalism and that of Trump.  Both men sought to intimidate journalists and make them live in fear.  If one follows Trump’s reaction to the murder it is clear he did not care, and interestingly after his presidency his son-in-law received a $2 billion Saudi investment in his business fund.  Salman would even go after Amazon because of the Post’s coverage of his government and referred to Bezos as “that Jew.”

Washington Post Publisher Fred Ryan.

(Washington Post Publisher Fred Ryan)

Baron should be praised for his honesty as he navigated his relationship with Bezos and allowed a focus on Amazon’s anti-union labor practices, its marketing strategies that hurt secondary vendors, and most importantly its surveillance policies – Alexa is in your home gathering intelligence against you and your family!  To Bezos’ credit he did not interfere with any of any story that involved his personal life or businesses.  Further, Baron delves into issues dealing with social media, racial practices at the paper, and objectivity that brought him into conflict with younger and black journalists.

In the end Baron grew skeptical with the reporter’s combative tweets and their airing of their social views.  A newspaper traditionalist Baron almost resigned amidst the covid crisis, and Black Lives Matter Movement as he felt reporters were putting their own opinions above those of the newspaper. In summation I agree with Sewell Chan’s conclusion presented in his New York Times review in which he states, “As Baron describes it, the job of an editor today revolves as much around spreadsheets, team building, labor negotiations and social media guidelines as it does around relationships with reporters and supervision of coverage. That Baron managed that high-wire act so successfully — The Post won 10 Pulitzers on his watch — in an era of wrenching changes in politics and journalism shows that newsroom leadership, however devoid of ease or glamour, remains essential.”*

*Sewell Chan, “At His Post,” New York Times, October 15, 2023.

THE WOUNDED WORLD: W.E.B. DU BOIS AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR by Chad Williams

(W.E.B. Du Bois)

W.E.B Du Bois devoted his life’s work to achieving equal citizenship for all African Americans.  He worked tirelessly to achieve his goals after becoming the first African American to earn a doctorate from Harvard University and would go on to teach social sciences at Atlanta University, become one of the founders of the NAACP, edited “The Crisis” magazine which was his megaphone to the black community, lectured worldwide, promoted African and West Indian rights against colonial powers, and published a series of thought provoking books.  Du Bois was a firm believer that for African Americans to achieve full civil rights and political representation they would have to be led by a black intellectual elite – the key being advanced education that would lead to leadership.  He targeted racism, lynchings, Jim Crow laws, and all types of discrimination in his writing and public appearances.

 One of the most controversial aspects of his belief system was supporting America’s entrance into World War I, a decision he would come to regret.  He argued that if African Americans joined the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) in Europe to fight Germany and showed their talent and bravery it would raise their level of acceptance by the American people upon their return resulting in greater rights of freedom and safety.  This dream was negated by the reality of American racism , covert and overt violence, and persecution – all conditions consistent with the African American experience throughout American history.  Even US Army officials exhibited extreme racism and blatant lies as they erroneously depicted the combat experience of African American troops in Europe.

Black and white photo of African American Army officer walking downstairs passing a white Officer. Both men are wearing World War One style uniforms and hats.
(Charles Young at Camp Grant in 1919).

To atone for this grievous error in judgement, Du Bois wanted to set the historical record straight as World War I did not prove to be the catalyst for equal rights.  His strategy centered on a book he would spend nearly two decades entitled, THE BLACK MAN AND THE WOUNDED WORLD.  His effort was never completed nor published but it has become the core of an important new monograph by Chad L. Williams, THE WOUNDED WORLD: W.E.B. DUBOIS AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR.

Williams’ book is a comprehensive study of how Du Bois went about achieving his goals.  He recounts his battles with the NAACP to obtain funding and support, his battles with fellow historians who he competed with him in trying to produce the definitive study of the war, the role of his ego which did not allow him to accept enough assistance and share the limelight, his writings, particularly in the NAACP magazine, “The Crisis” which he edited, his travels worldwide promoting the Pan African world, and most importantly disseminating his ideas and research a function of his relationship with black veterans of the war, and a firm belief that American racism was destroying black progress, and the colonial European powers imprisoned people of color in a system where they could not achieve progress.

Williams’ approach is a carefully developed thesis supported by numerous excerpts from Du Bois’ writings and commentary buttressed by accounts provided by friends and foes alike, in addition to communications with black veterans and competing historians.  Williams fully explores Du Bois’ ideology which rested on his fear that if Germany were victorious in the war its racist government would negatively impact “Black folk” and brown people throughout the world.  He knew Germany well having studied at the University of Berlin providing him with firsthand knowledge of the Kaiser’s march toward autocracy, militarism, and empire.  He argued that black loyalty to England, France, and Belgium was of the utmost importance despite their colonial records. He believed an allied victory representing democracy was the only acceptable outcome in the war.  However, the result of this call to duty was dominated by racism in the military as whites refused to serve with blacks, military leaders refused to allow black officers to command black troops resulting in southern white racist officers treating black soldiers with contempt and at times violence.  Williams mentions examples of black officers like Major Charles Young, a graduate of West Point, but being an exceptional soldier did not allow him to fulfill the role Du Bois sought for him and others as the leaders of a new generation of blacks who would gain acceptance from American society.

(Over 350,000 African American soldiers served in WWI)

Williams portrays the lies put forth by military authorities when it came to black officers and their service, the performance of the 369th and 92nd divisions of the army, particularly the 368th Infantry Regiment, known as the Harlem Hell fighters, who were assigned to the French Army in April 1918. The Hell fighters saw much action, fighting in the Second Battle of the Marne, as well as the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, where black officers were blamed for the slow progress of the offensive with white officers falsely reporting on the performance of thousands of black troops.  The treatment of black soldiers carried over into their medical care during and after the war  where at first, black doctors and nurses were not allowed to treat black veterans at the new Tuskegee Institute Hospital.

When black  veterans returned home they were met with violence and race riots resulting in the deaths of over a thousand people in Tulsa, OK, Chicago, IL, Knoxville, TN, Phillips County, AK, Charleston, SC, and Washington, DC all described in detail by the author.  Further with the 1919 Red Scare many blamed black soldiers for bringing communism to America when they returned from Europe. When confronted with the reality of the African American soldier’s experience during their training, the war itself, and the reception they received upon returning from the battlefield, Du Bois committed himself to telling their story.

Williams pulls no punches in presenting Du Bois’ failed odyssey in completing his work.  First, he was overwhelmed with materials from his own travels to France  to conduct research and influence the Paris Peace Conference.  Second, he could never get a handle on the voluminous amounts of material sent to him by black veterans.  Third, his intense schedule that saw him work for Pan-African conferences and other causes.  Lastly, his other writings, lectures, and as mentioned before his ego which did not allow him to work successfully with others.  Further, he distorted his own experiences praising France for using Senegalese troops in the war and their treatment of blacks.  All one has to do is examine the French colonial experience to see how wrong he was.  Another example is his visit to the Soviet Union in 1926 and for a time believing in the “Marxist wonderland.” 

African-American soldiers (and one of their white officers) of the 369th Infantry, known as the Harlem Hellfighters, practice what they will soon experience, fighting in the trenches of the Western Front. They are wearing French helmets and using French-issued rifles and equipment, the logic being that since they were fighting under French command, it was easier to resupply them from the French system than trying to get American-issued items. (National Archives and Records Administration)

(African-American soldiers (and one of their white officers) of the 369th Infantry, known as the Harlem Hellfighters, practice what they will soon experience, fighting in the trenches of the Western Front)

In the latter part of the narrative Williams explores Du Bois’ life work particularly his realization that his World War I opus would never be completed.  The 1920s to 1945 period produced a great deal of success academically with the publication of BLACK RECONSTRUCTION, a widely accepted history of African Americans from 1850 to 1876.  In explaining Du Bois’ ideas in his books and other writings Williams traces Du Bois evolution ideologically as he argued that racism and colonization were responsible for two world wars and the failings of democracy pushing him further to the left.  As he grew older Du Bois concluded that even after World War II, African Americans were confronted with the same hostility and violence as they did in the post 1918 period.  Much to Du Bois’ dismay it was apparent that the arguments he developed for decades pertaining to racism and colonization still applied and he would work assiduously to ameliorate this situation until his death.

Throughout the two decades of preparing the book Du Bois had to overcome his “Close Ranks” editorial from the war supporting the use of African American troops in the war as a vehicle to obtain equality.  His decision was wrong, and he would pay a price professionally and personally.  Williams describes Du Bois’ effort as his most significant work to never reach the public as he struggled to finish his manuscript and the legacy of the war, however, “By rendering this story in such rich archival detail, Williams’s book is a fitting coda to Du Bois’s unfinished history of Black Americans and the First World War.”*

  • Matthew Delmont. “W.E.B. Du Bois and the Legacy – and Betrayal – of Black Soldiers,” New York Times, April 4, 2023.
W.E.B. DuBois, 1904