THE WOMEN by Kristin Hannah

vietnam nurse reflections

The Vietnam War has sparked numerous arguments over the roles of diverse groups and vocations.  One that has been dominant is the role of nurses, particularly women.  How many served in what capacity, their experiences dealing with combat, and interactions with wounded soldiers all come to mind.  There have been a few works of non-fiction that stand out in the discussion of nurses during the war, they include; AMERICAN DAUGHTER GONE TO WAR by Winnie Smith; HEALING WOUNDS by Diane Carlson Evans; and HOME BEFORE MORNING by Lynda Van Devanter.  Recently, Kristin Hannah, the bestselling  New York Times author has published her latest novel that deals with the issues faced by American nurses during the war, entitled THE WOMEN.

Hannah’s work of fiction begins with Frances Grace McGrath, a twenty year old nursing student asking the question “why couldn’t women be heroes?” after examining the photos in her father’s study displayed on what he called his “wall of heroes.”  McGrath noticed there were no women on display, and with her brother off to fight in Vietnam she surmised that he too would soon be exhibited on the “wall.”  Tired of being primed by her parents to marry and have children, McGrath decides to enlist in the US Army Nursing Corps and join her brother in Vietnam.  Almost immediately after joining up she learns that her brother has been killed in a helicopter accident, with the Pentagon offering few if any details about how he died.

Hannah’s work returns the reader to a time in American history where faith in government was decreasing daily and people took to the streets because of war – sounds familiar.  The book chronicles the evolution of Francis McGrath from an inexperienced nurse who was raised with the values of the 1950s to an independent women who found her calling in the surgical ward in Vietnam.  Hannah’s description of operating rooms, triage, the friendships and love she found, the impact on the Vietnamese people and American GIs rings true.  McGrath would soon learn that the rules of “polite society” that she left in Cornado Island, California was unimportant in Southeast Asia.  The only way she felt she could survive was develop a “hard shell” to protect her heart.  She quickly learned to focus, tune out the noise and napalm to help the wounded in pre-Op, Post-Op, and try to recover each day from what she experienced by returning to her “hootch” and commiserate with her fellow nurses.

Photo of Lt. Cmdr. Dorothy Ryan, a Navy nurse, checks on a Marine aboard the Repose in 1966.

(Lt. Cmdr. Dorothy Ryan, a Navy nurse, checks on a Marine aboard the Repose in 1966).

The horrors of war are on full display in THE WOMEN.  The descriptions of injured soldiers and Vietnamese peasants are raw and for McGrath it reminded her of her brother’s death.  Hannah’s approach to the daily existence of Vietnamese peasants is accurate as she describes the effects of napalm, agent orange, the destruction of their fields, and the loss of their men.

As the novel evolves you can discern McGrath becoming more and more disillusioned with the conduct of the war and the slaughter of the Vietnamese by American bombing.  Despite these feelings McGrath will reup for a second tour as she believes that nursing in Vietnam was now her calling.

There are a number of important storylines to the novel.  First and foremost is McGrath’s growth as a person, then her world crashing down upon her return to the United States, the loss of loved ones, and the betrayal she felt fostered by others.  Her experiences in a field hospital in Pleiku made her an exceptional nurse and achieved a competency that she believed she could never attain.  But the war created demons, particularly as everyone she loved seemed to perish in the war or lied to her.  Soon she would develop an emptiness that called for alcohol, pills, and rage, especially when she returned home and was spat upon by anti-war demonstrators and the fact that even her father did not recognize her experiences in a war zone and society in general held the belief that women did not fight in Vietnam.

Hannah creates a support system for McGrath through the friendship of fellow surgical nurses; Ethel Flint from a Charlottesville, Va. farm and Barb Johnson, a black nurse from a one stoplight town in Georgia.  The bonds of friendship, emotional support, and general love for each other made the war and post-war situation almost palatable.  This relationship and other aspects of the book take the reader on an emotional rollercoaster which is common in Hannah’s other novels.  Here, at times it is a bit overblown as McGrath passes from one crisis to another suffering from PTSD, and an inability to face the truth about her feelings and relationships.

Second Lieutenant Kathleen M. Sullivan treats a Vietnamese child during Operation MED CAP, a U.S. Air Force civic action program in which a team of doctors, nurses, and aides travel to Vietnamese villages, treat the sick and teach villagers the basics of sanitation and cleanliness. Date  1967 Current location  National Archives and Records Administration, College Park Link back to Institution infobox template Still Picture Records Section, Special Media Archives Services Division (NWCS-S)

(Air Force 2nd. Lt. Kathleen Sullivan comforts a Vietnamese child as part of the military’s Medical Civic Action Program, MEDCAP, which assisted people in villages).

The book is a time capsule of the 1960s through 1970s in American history.  As a historian who has taught and studied the war for decades I found the book factual, emotional, with an accurate representation of the scars that afflicted American society at the time.  From McGrath’s experiences one sees the elements of the lies and horrors of war which I am certain still haunt thousands of Americans.  With the current situation in Gaza and the demonstrations across college campuses I found myself back in the 1966-1974 period with the Tet Offensive, anti-war demonstrations, POWS, Kent State, and it is not a comfortable feeling.

Hannah knows how to pull every emotional string a reader can feel, especially for those of the Vietnam generation.  At times, McGrath’s personal chronology seems a bit much as she experiences so much tragedy, misinformation about life, a rejection by her family, and an inability to deal with her demons. The many plot twists that Hannah creates for McGrath are analogous to what many veterans experienced when they returned home.  Hannah does not offer anything new about the war and its aftermath, but she places women at the center of her novel, playing a significant role saving the lives of American soldiers.  This is an important story which needed to be told to a wide readership, which Hannah has accomplished very well.

Army nurses, 93rd Evacuation Hospital, Long Binh, Vietnam, 1968. B.J. (Greenway) Rasmussen Collection, Women In Military Service For America Memorial Foundation, Inc.

(U.S. Army nurses at the 93rd Evacuation Hospital in Long Binh, near Saigon, in 1968, work to stabilize a patient. Nurses in Vietnam often faced not only intense demands for patient care but also the threat of attacks on close-by military facilities and even the hospitals themselves).

DEVIL MAKES THREE by Ben Fountain

(Jean-Bertrand Aristide, centre, a former Catholic priest, won Haiti’s first free election in 1990 – he was removed in a coup in 1991)

The images out of Haiti that appear on the nightly news each day are horrible.  Starving children, gang violence, lack of government control, and a society still reeling from recent earthquakes seem almost normal.  Haiti is afflicted by constant gang wars fighting for control of Haitian cities, villages, and neighborhoods.  It is important that a new novel that highlights these difficulties has been released.  Ben Fountain’s fourth work, DEVIL MAKES THREE takes place in the early 1990s with Haitian instability at its height as a violent coup de’ état led to the overthrow of President Jean-Betrand Aristide’s government.  The novel tells a fascinating story which is fictional, however, the background commentary lays out the terror of the daily existence of the Haitian people.

Fountain develops his novel focusing on American expat Matt Amaker who is forced to abandon his beachfront scuba business because of the chaos that dominates the Caribbean country.  Amaker will team up with his friend Alix Variel, a member of a prominent Haitian family, and a partner in the defunct scuba business to pursue priceless treasures rumored to be buried on historical shipwrecks off a remote section of Haiti’s southern coast.  Admirers of the work of Joseph Conrad, Graham Greene and John Le Carrie should see similarities in Fountain’s approach as he develops this deeply humane political thriller.

JeanDo Washington Post

The novel opens with the 1991 coup in full swing.  The coup resulted from the first democratic election in Haiti’s history as Aristide, a populist Catholic priest was elected president of Haiti.  Aristide, a member of the National Front for Change and Democracy party, was one of the only church figures to speak out against the repression that existed under the dictatorships of the Duvalier family.  Aristide’s populist Lavalas movement which advocated the use of legislation and popular mobilization as vehicles for economic reform , an end to corruption, and justice for victims of the Haitian military and the Tonton Macoutes, (a Haitian paramilitary and secret police force created in 1959 by dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier) earned 67.5% of the popular vote.  Since Aristide’s program threatened the power of some of the Haitian elite, many of which were supporters of the Duvalier’s and the Haitian military it is not surprising that his election was soon negated. The coup took place on September 28, 1991, and was led by General Raoul Ceras and the Haitian army. The military immediately targeted pro-Aristide officials, rural and peasant organizations, neighborhood and community associations, and trade unions.  The press and radio stations were soon silenced.  Because of human rights abuses over 14,000 Haitian refugees arrived at Guantanamo seeking asylum.

As Fountain’s novel evolves the reign of terror of the Haitian military and gangs seem to permeate each scene.  As he proceeds Fountain provides an insightful description of Haitian politics and society with poverty, corruption, and violence on full display. 

Fountain introduces a number of important and interesting characters as the novel progresses.  Alix who convinces Matt to move to Haiti from the United States to set up a scuba business on land owned by his family and led by its matriarch Lena Varie plays a significant role.  Audrey O’Donnell aka. Shelly Graves is a “clandestine service trainee” who arrived during the coup as an assistant political attaché as her CIA cover.  Graves will fall in love with Alix creating a rather unusual relationship.  There is Tommy Rittenhouse who runs the Kokiyaj Beach Resort; Dr. Jean-Hubert Laroque who operates his family’s hospital which has existed in Haiti for generations; Misha Variel, a Ph. D candidate in French literature at Brown University who Matt adores; General Romeo Concers, second in command during the coup; Sonia Delambre, the mistress of Colonel Rene Delvas and a CIA asset; Charles Durham “CD” Nelms who helped finance the treasure hunting scheme and then abandoned Matt and Alix; and a host of other characters that remind one of Conrad, Greene, and Le Carrie.

The role of the CIA is important as Chief of Station Lorenz and his people grew concerned that Matt and Alix would discover gold and silver which would be seized by the Haitian army and used to stabilize its dictatorial regime.  This scenario was complex because Shelly and Alix’s affair will end, and she is distraught.  An undercurrent throughout is the role of the US government as people wonder if newly elected President Bill Clinton will allow boat people into the United States, a departure from the policies of the Bush administration.  Fountain integrates American duplicity, support for corporate interests, and in effect the exploitation of the Haitian people on a daily basis.

Employing Matt’s expertise, Fountain leads the reader through the deep exploration of the Haitian coast in search of treasure located in Anse Serrat. Matt is convinced there are bronze cannons, gold, and silver inside a shipwrecked Spanish galleon.  Fountain describes the intricacies of mapping the site, the types of tools used and other equipment in minute detail.  If you are a scuba aficionado, this book is for you!  In addition, Fountain describes flora, coral, and aquatic life as Matt’s team uncovers evidence of the Philippvs crest on one of the canons.

There are many layers to Fountain’s story.  There is the everyday existence of the Haitian people.  Starvation, poor or no medical care, murders and political assassination along with the seizure of private property by coup leaders, and little or no income for families who live in uninhabitable homes pervade the novel. The importance of vodou also dominates the story through constant references and the role of Duvie, a Vodou priest who tries to educate Matt and others of the importance Vodou plays in the lives of ordinary Haitians.

 As the novel evolves it is clear that coup leaders like General Concers are obsessed with the 500th anniversary of Columbus’ voyage and want Matt to locate the shipwrecked Santa Maria which would enhance his regime’s reputation.  This places Matt, Alix, and others in a precarious position as Concers requests are more like demands with consequences if they are not met.  At the same time Shelly, who thinks she knows everything through her sources, works to install a government that favors American interests.

Francine Prose writes in her New York Times review and succinctly gets to the core of Fountain’s novel writing, “Not only a skillful author, but a brave one, Fountain is drawn to difficult subjects. An earlier novel, the award-winning BILLY LYNN’S LONG HALFTIME WALK featured a damaged veteran of the Iraq war who was promoted, by the news media, as a conquering hero. It takes courage to set an extremely complicated work of fiction in Haiti, to write across the lines of class, color, gender, ideology and nationality. And it’s nervy to blow the whistle on how the C.I.A. has engineered regime changes worldwide, often with disastrous results.

Joseph Raoul Cédras (@PresidentCedras) / X

(General Raoul Cedras, Haitian military dictator)

Over 500 pages long, the novel has its slow spots. Some readers may be more interested than I was in the specs of diving equipment. Others may question why so much of the book is devoted to Matt and Alix’s harebrained plan to solve their money woes by finding sunken treasure off the Haitian coast. When a fabulously awful character, Davis, seems to wander in from an Elmore Leonard novel — ‘Someone needed to slap a warning on his forehead: Contents Under Pressure’— you can’t help wondering why Matt and Alix (neither of them fools) believe they can do business with him or with the rich, sketchy owner of the ship from which they dive in search of gold. But it all makes perfect sense when we realize that, during a time of lawlessness, a historically significant and potentially lucrative treasure hunt is just another ScubaRave, on steroids.

Given the thrum of political anxiety that keeps many of us awake at night, some readers might think: The last thing I need right now is a novel about a crisis that has worsened over time in one of the world’s poorest nations. I understand the sentiment, but I was grateful for the old-fashioned pleasure of immersion in a long book with engaging characters, a sense of history and place, and a multifaceted vision of people trying to figure out what to do when the world around them is changing.”*

  • Francine Prose, “Treasure and Trouble,” New York Times Book Review, October 15, 2023, p. 18.
Housing stacked Port-Au-Prince, Haiti. Port-au-Prince Stock Photo

(Port Au Prince circa 1992)

THE INTERNATIONALISTS: THE FIGHT TO RESTORE AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AFTER TRUMP by Alexander Ward

biden reaction to powell presentation on iraq at united nati

Today Ukraine burns and Republicans in the House of Representatives dither.  The Speaker, Mike Johnson has emerged as a puppet of Donald J. Trump and refuses to bring to the House floor a bill passed by the Senate that would provide funding for the Kyiv government which would assist in preventing any further Russian gains on the battlefield.  This seems to be part of Trump’s election strategy of not allowing any “Biden Political Wins” in addition to his commentary that when he resumes his presidency after the November election he would either withdraw from NATO and/or refuse to honor Article 5 of the NATO charter.  He has further stated that if a NATO state were attacked his decision would be based on whether that country had “paid its bills.”  In addition, the former president has encouraged Russian President Putin to attack any country of his choosing.  This is where Mr. Trump stands today, but it is not much different from the attitude he espoused during his four years in the White House.

When Joseph Biden assumed the presidency in January 2021 he sought to undo the damage that the Trump administration had done to NATO and relations with our allies in general.  The process of returning US foreign policy to its traditional post-World War II strategy, as the Biden administration was confronted with the growing isolationist wing of the Republican party is the main topic of Alexander Ward’s new book, THE INTERNATIONALISTS: THE FIGHT TO RESTORE AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AFTER TRUMP.  The post-war strategy as developed by Jake Sullivan, Biden’s National Security advisor would evolve into a new approach that centered on a “return to fundamentals: a healthy middle class powered by a humming industrial base, a humility about what the US military alone can accomplish, a solid cadre of allies, attention to the most existential threats, and a refresh of the tenets that sustain American democracy…an old road map to a new future.”

(National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan)

Ward, a national security reporter for Politico relies on interviews with the most important decision makers in the Biden administration and its allies and his own incisive analysis to offer the definitive account of American foreign policy from the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan to the current war in Ukraine initiated by Moscow.  It reads as a first draft of history and its subject matter is of the utmost importance as Biden and his team were able to stabilize and reconstruct what Trump had damaged.  What is clear is that should Trump regain the presidency all the work of the Biden administration will have been for nought, and America’s national security will clearly be endangered.

Ward begins with the understanding between individuals like Ben Rhodes, an Obama national security advisor, and Jake Sullivan, a Hillary Clinton advisor that to defeat Donald Trump in 2020 they needed to come together and create a “Shadow Foreign Policy Cabinet” to flush out a coherent foreign policy strategy which would become the basis for an infrastructure for the next presidential election.  After delving into the career path of both men and Anthony Blinken, an advisor to Joe Biden since his Senate days Ward shifts his focus to the prevailing problems that Biden would face at the outset of his presidency – Afghanistan, Israeli-Hamas conflict, the war in Ukraine, the relationship with Russia, and a number of other critical issues.

Newly confirmed US Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks during a welcome ceremony at the State Department in Washington, DC on January 27, 2021.

(Secretary of State Anthony Blinken)

Overall Biden receives high marks from Ward except for the handling of America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Relying on interviews with key players who argued for leaving a military presence in  Afghanistan and those who favored a complete withdrawal.  Biden’s position was clear from the get-go – an immediate withdrawal.  Though he was hampered by Trump’s deal with the Taliban that stated that US forces would leave by May 1, 2021, Biden reopened negotiations with the Taliban in the hopes of obtaining their cooperation to facilitate the American departure.  The Biden administration operated on the assumption that they had 18-24 months leeway before the Kabul government would collapse and the Taliban taking over.  As events played out that intelligence was faulty and way off the mark as the Taliban would reach the outskirts of Kabul within weeks of the American drawdown. 

The Biden administration argued that we built and trained a 300,000 man army over a twenty year period and now many would not fight, allowing the Taliban to quickly march on Kabul.  This created another problem in that there were at least 2500 individuals who worked for US forces over the years who would be in grave danger once the Taliban took over. The issue became SIVs (strategic immigrant visas) that were needed for the US military to transport them out of their country.  Ward examines all aspects of the crisis that ensued which I can only crudely describe as a “cluster fuck” as American policy makers oversaw chaos and Biden’s greatest fear a visual similar to the April 1975 exit from South Vietnam as the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong captured Saigon.  Biden would blame the Afghan military and its corrupt government in Kabul for the images of Afghans trying to escape the Taliban as they entered Kabul.  There is no other description of Biden rationalizations and what transpired as humiliating.  Biden firmly believed that the US would no longer commit itself to wars in the Middle East and Southwest Asia and it should use its influence and power to concentrate on the Russian and Chinese threat, but in reality Biden’s Afghan policy was “a failure of process and foresight.”

Afghans running alongside US military plane

(The chaos of US withdrawal from Afghanistan, 2021)

Ward’s examination of the Ukrainian crisis reflects a president who wanted to support Ukraine in its conflict with Russia since Putin’s seizure of Crimea in 2014.  He recreates the Biden-Zelensky relationship which did not get off on a strong footing. The former Ukrainian television personality believed that Biden was not taking the Russian threat seriously enough to allow Ukraine access to the sophisticated equipment that the current war proved was needed.  Biden held back armaments and did not show the respect to Zelenskyy that the Ukrainian president believed he was entitled to.  Relations deteriorated in 2021 as the US supported the completion of Nord Stream 2, a pipeline that would circumvent Ukraine and cost Kyiv over $2 billion a year in revenue.  A Zelensky visit to Washington in September 2021 did little to improve Kyiv’s view of the Biden administration.  Insufficient military aid and Biden’s full agenda with other world problems did not move Ukraine higher on the US foreign policy agenda.  The Biden administration did so in order to rebuild relations with Germany which would benefit the most from the new pipeline because of Trump administration policies.  No matter whose feelings were hurt it was clear by October 2021 with thousands of Russians troops on its border along with a massive amount of equipment according to US intelligence Putin was about to invade.  The American response was to educate the world as to what Putin was planning and not be presented with a Russian fait accompli as they had been in 2014 over Crimea.  As General Milley told Biden “We’re looking at a significant land invasion sometime in the coming months…The plan is to take down the country of Ukraine.  It was the Russian version of shock and awe.”

In his discussion concerning Ukraine Ward focuses on President Zelensky.  Despite repeated evidence of the coming invasion from December 2021 to February 24, 2022, Zelensky, according to Biden aides, was in “la-la land” in refusing to accept how dire the situation had become.  Zelensky had convinced himself that no invasion was about to take place and the Biden administration’s public release of intelligence warning the world of Putin’s intentions was hurting the Ukrainian economy and scaring people to leave their country.  This aspect of the book is important based on the west’s public posture of support toward Zelensky after the invasion took place when reality finally sunk in.

An early theme in Biden’s presidency was that the US needed to show democracy delivered for its people and could do the same for people worldwide by “steeling the liberal world order and curbing China’s growing influence….and keeping an aggressive Russia at bay.”  The key was to rebuild relationships with European allies before it could confront Putin’s expansionism – Putin needed to know that the US and its allies were now working in concert.  Biden’s message to Putin was that “confrontation and competition where needed, cooperation where policy” was the American approach.  Once the two leaders met, Putin’s harangue about Ukraine and the fact that their people and the Russian population were one, NATO was a threat to Russian borders, and that American sanctions were not acceptable was clear.  The key as mentioned was Germany and the recalibration of NATO even if Kyiv thought it was a betrayal.

Ward’s approach to dealing with Israel and his analysis is dead on.  Biden had to overcome his past support for Israel that went back decades in the Senate and his personal relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.  Biden did not want Secretary of State Anthony Blinken to be drawn into the cauldron of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as had occurred under John Kerry in the second Obama administration.  Biden argued that it took too much air out of the room and left little for other prominent issues.  The confrontation between the two sides at the outset of the administration was a precursor to the current war in Gaza.  Biden wanted to stay out of clashes in East Jerusalem and he opposed the violence perpetrated by Israeli settlers in the West Bank.  Biden had difficulty accepting the evictions of Palestinians from the West Bank and correctly warned that Hamas could only benefit.  Under pressure from the left wing of the Democratic Party Biden finally came out and supported a two-state solution and the rights of Palestinians.

The events of October 7, 2023, proved that Netanyahu’s policies were faulty and designed to keep him in power and away from criminal prosecution.  Biden’s abhorrence of what Hamas perpetrated on that day and public support was unquestioned.  However, as Israeli disregard for Palestinian civilians in Gaza  and the actions of settlers in the West Bank brought domestic and international pressure, Biden has had to put his unequivocal support for the Jewish state behind him and come out publicly for humanitarian aid, a two state solution, and criticizing Israel that its policies were detrimental to its future security needs.

Smoke and flames rise over during the shelling near Kyiv

(Russian invasion of Ukraine, February 24, 2022)

As Ward tries to explain the underlying principles of Biden foreign policy he describes the personal and emotional platform of the president’s decision making.  The role of his son, Beau’s death from cancer at the age of 46 always played a significant role in his father’s mindset.  Biden firmly believed that the “burn pits” in Iraq contributed to his son’s death because of his service in Iraq.  Biden deeply felt his son’s demise and did not want other parents to experience what he had – this mantra is ever present in Biden’s comments in the White House, the campaign trail, and general conversation.

Ward focuses on the Biden foreign policy team’s attempt to foster a new world view and how circumstances making such course corrections make it difficult.  For the Biden team they were not blessed with the best of circumstances having to deal with Bibi Netanyahu. Vladimir Putin, and a corrupt and incompetent government in Kabul.  The book itself relies heavily on sources in the State Department and the White House, and less so the Pentagon.  The result is that the book is skewed toward staffer’s eye views and provides too much emphasis on Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Afghanistan and  less so China, climate change , Iran, immigration and supply chain issues.

The book illustrates the strength and weaknesses of personal diplomacy which Biden relies on heavily.  His inability to influence Netanyahu, Putin, and former Afghan President Mohammad Ghani points to the need for greater reliance on a collective policy vision as personal ties are not always identical with national interests or political ones. This is clear as Biden could not influence Netanyahu’s right wing government or Putin’s plans to invade Ukraine.

Ward’s monograph is an important work of history in that it lays the groundwork for events he delves into that have continued today.  These events have proven detrimental to Palestinians, Afghanis, and Ukrainians as the war in Gaza rages on, Russian indiscriminate bombing of Ukraine continues to foster terror, and the Taliban represses those who disagree with its harsh rule, especially women.  As we move closer to the 2024 presidential election these issues will still be at the forefront of the news cycle and it will be interesting to see if Trump’s “America First “approach to international relations or Biden’s attempts to rekindle America’s place in the world will win out.  No matter the result, the issue of democracy at home and a liberal internationalist agenda abroad are at stake.

vice president joe biden

(President Biden and his son Beau)

MOSCOW X by David McCloskey

(Lefortovo Prison, Moscow, Russia)

A few months ago, I was introduced to David McCloskey’s first novel, DAMASCUS STATION.  The book was a “thriller,” and though it was a fictional account that focused in large part on the Syrian Civil War, its realistic portrayal of events had characteristics of non-fiction and created a portal for the reader to view events in the Middle East through the lens of an American intelligence operative.  Further, it offered an accurate portrayal of how CIA agents operated in the field, how they were trained, and why their work is so important to American national security.  In his newest novel McCloskey, a former CIA analyst and consultant at McKinsey and Company has authored MOSCOW X another entertaining work that a former CIA operative describes as a “brilliant novel that captures the nuances of field work in hostile environments and the terror that grips every intelligence officer when confronting enemies.”

In his latest effort McCloskey creates an intricate plot that must be followed carefully.  It opens as an FSB agent on a mission from the FSB head steals an enormous sum of money  from a billionaire oligarch who preceded the FSB head.  In response to this action, the oligarch’s daughter, an SVR operative plots to recover the money and respond to threats against her family’s wealth.  The daughter is married to another FSB agent, who also happens to be in charge of $700 million of Vladimir Putin’s personal treasure.

A drone photo of the palace, which sits some 18 kilometers down the coast from the popular Russian holiday town of Gelendzhik

(Drone photo of the palace, which sits some 18 kilometers down the coast from the popular Russian holiday town of Gelendzhik)

As the novel evolves, McCloskey introduces two scenarios.  First, we are introduced to Artemis Aphrodite Proctor, CIA Station Chief in Tajikistan, who succumbs to a honey trap set by the FSB and refuses recruitment resulting in her dispatch to Langley, Virginia.  The actions Proctor takes form a central part of the story.  Second, involves the wealth of Andrei Apagov, chairman of Rossiya Industrial, a Russian conglomerate swollen with the state’s most strategic assets.  Apagov’s bank is robbed of 200 gold bars by FSB Lieutenant Colonel Konstantine Konstanstinovich Chernov, a Russian nationalist whose boss, Vassily Platonovich Gusev, known as “Goose,” has ordered the seizure against an old foe.  Apagov wants his daughter Anna who is a SVR operative to investigate what has occurred before they confront President Putin who may lock them away in Siberia and steal the rest of their wealth.  It is Anna’s job to infiltrate Goose’s operation to recover the family’s assets and in doing so must use her estranged husband Vadim Kovalchuk, head of the Private Wealth Division at Bank Rossiya as bait.

These two scenarios come together and at times overlap as the espionage thriller evolves.  McCloskey creates the realistic atmosphere of spy tradecraft.  His discussion of what it was like to enter Russia as an outsider, the types of surveillance Russians employ, the tools needed to survive all seem spot on, i.e., various devices CIA and FSB “techies” can deliver; preparation for the op – plying people with vodka, creating antidotes for Russian food and drinking etc.  McClosky provides an in depth analysis as to how the FSB goes after someone it is trying to ruin as Stalin’s NKVD used to argue that “your lack of a criminal record is not to your merit.  It is our flaw.”

Apart from the characters previously mentioned, McCloskey introduces a series of personalities that are key to the story’s development.  Hortensia (Sia) Fox works at the Hynes, Dawson law firm which laundered money and protected oligarch wealth at the same time as  working for the CIA.  Maximiliano Castillo, a Mexican horse rancher whose family has worked with the CIA for decades.  Most importantly is Aphrodite Proctor who upon returning to CIA headquarters developed an operation to flip Anna or her estranged husband, Vadim as a means of gaining access to important personal information pertaining to Putin’s wealth.  McClosky carefully develops each character and their personal agendas as the plot unfolds – a plot that is emblematic of the CIA–FSB conflict that is ongoing today.

DavidMcCloskey_Author Photo.jpg

(David McCloskey, author)

There are other important characters, but the key is that as Proctor employs Sia and Max to recruit Anna for the CIA, Anna is trying to recruit Sia for the SVR.  Sia and Anna would soon realize they had a common enemy and should work together despite the fact they had different goals in mind.  They will form a key element as the CIA hopes to take advantage of internal Russian squabbles concerning money, property, and Putin’s overall wealth.

McCloskey introduces a different element in his current work that differs from DAMASCUS STATION and events pertaining to the Syrian Civil War.  The use of technology is at the forefront of the effort to gain secrets relevant to Putin’s wealth.  Different technologies are integrated into the story as CIA “techies” penetrate Vadim’s personal computer and other sites and sources which takes the plot to a new level.

The details of surveillance, arrests, threats, disinformation, and violence are all essential to the outcome of the plot.  McCloskey’s observations are relevant to today’s attitude by large swaths of the Russian population.  As Anna argues with Sia that she does not want to overthrow Putin.  She sees herself as a Russian patriot believing that Russia has always been ruled by an autocrat and that governmental system is the only way the Russian people can survive.  She argues that the Russian people seem comfortable with corruption and chaos which was the norm and she, as most Russians today have no problem with it.

McCloskey has authored another intense espionage caper mixing tradecraft and glitz to maintain the reader’s attention.  The plot is loaded with double and triple crosses and after about 100 pages you will not want to stop reading this mesmerizing tale of intrigue.

Lefortovo Prison

(Lefortovo Prison, Moscow, Russia)

THE SHOWMAN: THE INSIDE STORY OF THE INVASION THAT SHOOK THE WORLD AND MADE A LEADER OUT OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY by Simon Shuster

Working trip of the President of Ukraine to Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk, Kirovohrad and Cherkasy regions

(Ukrainian President Zelensky visting troops at the front)

As the war grinds on in Ukraine, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson remains adamant that he will not bring to the House floor for a vote a bi-partisan bill negotiated by Democratic and Republican senators that would provide aid to Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, and funds to deal with the crisis at our southern border.  It seems that Donald Trump has instructed the Speaker on how to proceed with the legislation because if it passed it would provide President Biden a political victory during our election season.  The fact that Ukraine is slowly running out of munitions and weapons has no impact on the MAGA world as its goal is to re-elect former President Trump and the consequences be damned.  Vladimir Putin sits in the Kremlin with that cheshire smile on his face laughing on the inside as he observes the political chaos in Congress and believes that anything that would return Trump to the White House would benefit Russia.  The result is that he will drag the war of attrition out further in the hope of achieving that goal. 

Meanwhile, frustration in Kyiv, NATO headquarters, European capitals, and Washington is reaching new heights as the Biden administration tries to cull a deal.  The man responsible for leading the Ukrainian people, President Volodymyr Zelensky tries his best to convince House and Senate members of the crisis that will ensue in Europe and the threats it will create should Russia prevail.  Zelensky is the key figure in the process and is the subject of Time magazine correspondent Simon Shuster’s new book THE SHOWMAN: THE INSIDE STORY OF THE INVASION THAT SHOOK THE WORLD AND MADE A LEADER OUT OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY which provides in intimate detail the story of Zelensky’s evolution from a professional comedian to a symbol of Ukrainian resistance to the Russian invasion of February 24, 2022 and how he has tried to rally western democracies to support his cause and bring about Russia’s defeat in Crimea and eastern Ukraine.

There are a number of important books concerning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Ukrainian history.  Most recent are those by Yaroslav Hrytsak, Serhii Plokhy, Owen Matthews, Joshua Yaffa, Paul D’Anieri, Christopher M. Smith, Jade McGlynn, Luke Harding, and Christopher Miller.  All are excellent monographs, but Shuster’s biography brings the life and actions of President Zelensky into greater focus than other authors.

Shuster offers an unparalleled look at what Zelensky, his wife Olena Zelenskaya, his two children, and the Ukrainian people experienced as the war drew closer, and the actual invasion and its consequences.  Shuster zeroes in on Zelinsky’s decision making, tactics to try and invigorate and reassure the Ukrainian people, and the impact of the strategic approach taken by the Ukrainian military leadership.  All aspects of the war are explored with many insights and airtight analysis.

Shuster does well in describing Zelensky’s rise from being an entertainer to a successful politician.  Among the important points he makes focuses on the characteristics and talents of the comedic world and the entertainment business that Zelinsky developed over the years and how he employed them in his transition to politics.  Many of the individuals who worked with him in his production company would find themselves as part of his “inner governing circle” once he assumed the presidency of Ukraine.

Local resident hugs a Ukrainian servicewoman after Russia's retreat from Kherson, in central Kherson

(The liberation of Kherson from Russian troops)

There are a number of interesting points that Shuster offers in dealing with Zelensky’s approach to Putin, the preparation of the domestic population for war, and the outbreak of war itself.  For a long time Zelensky was under the delusion that he could deal with Putin on a one to one basis.  He believed once he sat down with him he could rely on his personal persuasive talents to come to agreements with the former KGB operative.  This reflects Zelensky’s naivete when it came to Putin.  I am certain that Zelinsky was completely aware of Putin’s Pan Slavic beliefs, his mantra that Ukraine was part of Russia, not a separate country, and a modus operandi employing “little green men” in eastern Ukraine, Crimea.  Zelensky did get his face to face with Putin and negotiations in 2019 which in the end were a failure.  Prisoner swaps were agreed to but on issues of substance dating back to the Orange Revolution of 2014 there was no progress.  Putin was inflexible, arguing there were no Russian troops in the Donbas region so Zelinsky’s goal of Russian troop withdrawal before any elections could take place was a non-starter.

Zelensky firmly believed that war could be avoided and did his best to prevent a furtherance of a conflict that began in 2014.  He refused to accept American intelligence that the war was imminent.  He was overly careful in making war preparations fearing he would scare the Ukrainian people, would harm the domestic economy as Ukraine was dependent upon Russia for gas and oil and a significant amount of investment would be lost, and lastly, it would send the wrong message to Putin fostering an invasion.  Nationalists in the Ukrainian parliament opposed Zelensky’s stance arguing he was selling out to the Russians.

Ukrainian President Attends Wreath-Laying Ceremony At Tomb Of Unknown Soldier

(Ukraine’s First Lady Olena Zelenskaya)

Shuster is correct in that Putin was a spy who believed in subterfuge as opposed to direct combat.  A prime example is Putin’s relationship with Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian media billionaire who was Zelensky’s main political opponent.  Medvedchuk’s relationship went back decades with Putin attending his wedding and was the godfather to his daughter.  In reality Medvedchuk, a member of parliament, was Putin’s surrogate whose media empire attacked Zelensky repeatedly, particularly over his Covid vaccine policies as Putin’s “Trojan Horse.”  As Zelensky’s popularity declined in 2019 and 2020 and Medvedchuk’s political party made gains in parliament, Putin came to believe that he could achieve his takeover of Ukraine by democratic means once his surrogate replaced Zelensky.  This was not to be as Zelensky confiscated Medvedchuk’s assets which Shuster argues pushed Putin toward invasion and restore what he termed the “historical unity” between Russia and Ukraine.

Many wonder why Ukraine was able to push back the invasion within a few weeks.  The key was the battle for Kyiv which was the most significant combat in Europe since World War II.  Others have reflected on the idea that Russia relied on maps that dated to 1989, the fact that troops and certain commanders did not receive their orders until two days before the invasion, the Russian military did not train enough for the type of resistance it came upon, etc.  But the keys as Shuster points out were the purchase of Bayraktars drones from Turkey which were successful against the long Russian columns of tanks, artillery, and other equipment and supplies.  The appointment of Major-General Valery Zaluzhny as commander of Ukrainian forces as unlike senior Ukrainian officers he was not trained in the Soviet model of warfare, and he implemented a more offensive approach toward the Russians in the east.  Now they could fire back, something they had been restrained from doing before Zaluzhny took command.  Lastly, American satellite intelligence proved a boon to Ukrainian defense and offensive actions.

Valentyna Nechyporenko, 77, mourns at the grave of her 47-year-old son Ruslan, during his funeral at the cemetery in Bucha, on the outskirts of Kyiv, Monday, April 18, 2022. Ruslan was killed by Russian army on March 17 while delivering humanitarian aid to his neighbours in the streets of Bucha.

(Results of Russian atrocities in Bucha)

Shuster describes the atrocities of Bucha in intimate detail, the key battle for Mariupol, the siege at the Azovstal Steel works and the fighting in Kyiv suburbs.  He describes a leader  who seemed to find himself and employ his communication talents once the invasion began.  He kept pushing for American and European weaponry which in large part was successful as the war ground on.  One of the key elements for war on Putin’s part was the weakening of NATO and blocking Ukrainian membership in the alliance.  Putin’s goals backfired as Ukrainian military needs were met by the west.  Kyiv gave up old Soviet military weapons and systems and integrated NATO equipment into its military arsenal. The more weapons that arrived and with the training of Ukrainian forces by NATO, more and more they became a western force.  Further, to Putin’s anger, Finland and Sweden joined NATO increasing NATO’s presence on its 900 mile border with Finland.  Putin’s response was vindictive bombing of civilians and threats of nuclear war.

(Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) arrive to attend a meeting on Ukraine with French President and German Chancelor at the Elysee Palace, on December 9, 2019 in Paris. – Russian president will for the first time hold formal talks with his Ukrainian counterpart over the conflict in Ukraine’s east, at a much-anticipated summit in Paris)

FRANCE-RUSSIA-GERMANY-UKRAINE-POLITICS-CONFLICT-DIPLOMACY

(Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (R) arrive to attend a meeting on Ukraine with French President and German Chancelor at the Elysee Palace, on December 9, 2019 in Paris. – Russian president will for the first time hold formal talks with his Ukrainian counterpart over the conflict in Ukraine’s east, at a much-anticipated summit in Paris)

Shuster has not produced a work of hagiography as is seen by his commentary on prewar policies and digs around the corrupt oligarchs in Zelensky’s orbit.  Despite this THE SHOWMAN is a portrait of a brave, inspirational, and bold leader who did not shy away from danger, visiting troops and combat areas to share in some way what his people were experiencing. Shuster, who has been reporting from Kyiv since 2009, relies a great deal on interviews with the most important players in the Ukrainian drama.  He would interview Zelensky in 2019 as a presidential candidate and was able to become part of his inner circle and shadow him for the first year of the war.  He points to Zelensky’s limited experience as a statesman who was able to gain the trust and support from the West employing “incessant repetition” of his demands through rhetoric, his personality, and commitment to his cause.  Zelensky did resort to highhandedness at times which Shuster blames on the exigency of war, not any drive toward autocracy.

Zelensky’s transformation into a wartime leader was not predictable and he evolved  turning the conflict into one the West would take ownership of.  The problem is that as the war continues it seems the West might be losing interest, or “Ukraine fatigue,” as the Republican Congress threatens further military aid, and Donald Trump may appear on the horizon as President which would play into Putin’s hands.  This fear was reaffirmed this weakened at a Trump political rally as the ex-president pontificated on NATO warning members that if they didn’t pay enough dues he would not honor Article Five of the NATO charter.  He further stated that if that were the case he would encourage Putin to do “as he damned well pleased” and even encouraged the Russian autocrat to invade westward.  In the interim the conflict is pretty much frozen on the battlefield as both sides fight for limited territory.  The problem is should Ukraine run out of certain weapons by spring it could lead to negotiations where Putin achieves most of his demands or obtains out and out military victory and the end of a free Ukraine.

President honored the memory of the Kruty Heroes

COLD CREMATORIUM: REPORTING FROM THE LAND OF AUSCHWITZ by Josef Debreczeni

(Rail line leading into Auschwitz)

At a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, supposedly due to the war in Gaza, which is erroneous as the phenomenon was increasing long before Hamas’ brutal attack on October 7th.  At the same time, we recognize Holocaust Remembrance day which commemorates  the annihilation of Jews during World War II.  It is fitting that at this time Josef Debreczeni’s memoir of his time in “the land of Auschwitz,” COLD CREMATORIUM: REPORTING FROM THE LAND OF AUSCHWITZ has been rereleased.

Originally published in 1950 it was never translated because of the rise of McCarthyism which rejected any pro-Soviet literature; Cold War hostilities as Stalinists refused to accept the Jews as “victims of fascism” singled out for extinction; and the rise of anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe.  However, its appearance has made an important contribution to the great works of Holocaust literature as its author points out many things that have either been forgotten or overlooked.

Jonathan Freedland writes in the Forward to the book, referring to Debreczeni as a “witness, survivor, victim, and also an analyst, offering ruminations on some of the enduring questions raised by the Holocaust among them the puzzle of how arguably the most cultured nation in Europe could have led the continent’s descent into the most brutal savagery.”  Other vital insights provided by Debreczeni include a reminder that the victims of Nazi brutality did not know their imminent fate, a crucial fact in trying to comprehend how the Final Solution was possible, and that so many others certainly did.  Debreczeni reminds us that the Holocaust may have been developed in Berlin, it relied on accomplices throughout Europe – from liberal France to anti-Semitic Poland.  Many of these individuals may have suffered from “willful blindness,” as they would later deny seeing or participating in atrocities.  The author’s account of the actions perpetrated by Kapos, many of which were Jews is disturbing and for most beyond the capacity to imagine.  In a diabolical Nazi system “the best slave driver is a slave accorded a privileged position” is an accurate and scary proposition.

(They came with the things most valuable to them unaware that everything would be taken including many of their lives)

For Debreczeni many chroniclers of the Shoah do not emphasize the economic function of Auschwitz enough.  The author describes the German corporations involved to the point that many victims would have company names printed on their striped pajama type uniforms.  The brutal conditions that victims faced were laid bare.  The illicit trade between prisoners, kitchen workers, guards is ever prevalent – a life for people denied the fundamentals needed for survival – to eat, drink, bathe are all missing with disease and lice everywhere caused by a total lack of sanitation.  People were treated like animals, and for a chance at survival the same people morphed into animalistic behavior as they completely lost their identity, self-respect, and will to love.  The end result is a slow descent into madness and suicide for many who Debreczeni comes in contact with.  For those who deny the Holocaust this memoir is a stark response.

Debreczeni has written a haunting memoir, conveyed in the precise and unsentimental style of a professional journalist whose eyewitness account is of unmatched literary quality.  The author’s writing is evocative, employing irony, sarcasm, and an acerbic humor as he prods the reader into the “the Land of Auschwitz,” a place that is intellectually incomprehensible.  What sets the book apart is the reporting that the German guards were largely absent or stayed in the background.  Instead, it is the prisoners themselves who rule over each other depending on their status which forms a window into the complex organization of the camps.

The memoir begins in January 1944 with a prisoner transport where victims are oblivious as to their location and what the immediate future might bring, ending with liberation by Soviet forces in early May 1945.  Debreczeni provides precise details of who certain prisoners were and what they experienced.  For example, Mr. Mandel, a carpenter who always had a cigarette in his hand, but once they were taken away he still raises his empty fingers to his lips – he will be the first to die on the transport or the TB riddled Frenchman, a lower level Kapo in Auschwitz who developed a semblance of humanity as he warned prisoners as to what was about to happen to them.  Debreczeni holds nothing back in describing how people of varying backgrounds cooperated with the Nazis, including Jews.  A prime example is Weisz, a low brow salesclerk from Hungary, “a low-life Jew” who wielded a truncheon.  He was “power crazed, malicious, a wild beast,” who was the epitome of the Nazi system that “the best slave driver is a slave accorded a privileged position.”  Most of these types of slave drivers came from the “lower rungs” of Jewish society before the war.  Those who came from the highest levels of Jewish society were found to be helpless in the Nazi camp hierarchy.  Another is Herman, an SS guard who had been a bartender before the war and was one of the few guards who exhibited a degree of empathy as opposed to his murderous compatriots as he would drop a half smoked cigarette to the ground for a prisoner to find.   A typical power hungry individual was Sanyi Roth, a room commander for tent #28, a notorious repeat offender, serial burglar who was put in charge of the worst tent which housed murderers, robbers, and other “creatures.”  Interestingly, after Debreczeni flatters him he begins to take him under his wing.  Perhaps the most despicable person was Moric, the foremost Kapo of all camps, whose nickname was the Fuhrer of the death camps – the sole Jew who held as much power as Nazi officials.  Another individual who stands out, but in a positive fashion is Dr. Farkas, a Jewish physician who was forced to cooperate with the SS.  But at the same time was able to display compassion and medical knowledge to treat many inmates.  In fact, without his care Debreczeni would not have survived.

(The bunks at Auschwitz II-Birkenau)

The author provides an understanding of the evil the Nazis perpetrated aside from annihilation.  He describes the genius of those who developed the Final Solution.  To achieve mass death a killing infrastructure needed to be created.  A key aspect of which was the hierarchy of power which the Nazis implemented providing certain prisoners a key role in the genocide.  The Germans kept themselves invisible behind the barbed wire as “the allocation of food, the discipline, the direct supervision of work, and the first degree of terror – in sum, executive power – were in fact entrusted to slave drivers chosen randomly from among the deportees.”   For their hideous work they received certain benefits including more food, clothing, the opportunity to steal, and power over their fellow prisoners – power over life and death, which for many was intoxicating.  They all played a role in the vertical structure that resembled a military command where each person from the highest to the lowest Kapo knew their job and what would happen to them if they didn’t carry it out.  This structure also was apparent in camp hospitals like Dornhau where Doctors, medics, nurses, and other workers had specific roles in the Nazi hierarchy.

Debreczeni offers an exceptional description of the “Land of Auschwitz” which consisted of many sub-camps in addition to the more famous areas like Birkenau or lesser labor camps like Furstenstein which the author experienced personally which was typical of other work camps who held the same characteristics.  This area consisted of a castle complex which the Nazis destroyed in order to create an underground complex for a new headquarters for Hitler, should retreat be necessary and an arms factory on the site.

German corporations do not escape Debreczeni’s withering description as they paid the Nazi regime to rent slave labor and profited immensely.  Many books have been written about this subject.  For a complete list one can be found at https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/german-firms-that-used-slave-labor-during-nazi-era#google_vignette.  In Debreczeni’s case it was Sanger and Laninger who enslaved him as a tunnel digger.

There are many other elements that the author describes from the use of cigarettes as a medium of exchange which became its own underground industry.  Another medium of exchange was extracted gold crowns which many inmates did themselves to trade for food – the going rate was one crown for a weeks’ worth of soup.  The concept of the “will to live” is explored in detail with harrowing examples.  For the author, the will grew and like others he was willing to steal, fake jobs, and other strategies as a means of survival.  Debreczeni’s commentary concerning prisoner roundups is very disconcerting as prisoners were asked to volunteer for certain jobs and transport.  Many prisoners were willing to play Russian roulette to survive, most who did died, but a few would escape.

Each chapter seems more disturbing than the next and ranking the most horrifying material presented is very difficult.  Perhaps the chapters that stand out are those involving the Dornhau camp hospital which describes the Nazi approach to medical care and its sadistic treatment techniques carried out by most medical professionals.  It is this hospital that the term “cold crematorium” refers to.  Debreczeni’s recounting of the plight of his bunkmates is indescribable especially as typhus became rampant.

As Menachem Kaiser writes in his New York Times review, “How To Talk About Auschwitz,” “Debreczeni recounts his deportation to Auschwitz, and from there to a series of camps. This isn’t the sort of book you can get a sense of from a plot outline. Debreczeni suffers; he survives (or, more accurately, he does not die); he observes. His powers of observation are extraordinary. Everything he encounters in what he calls the Land of Auschwitz — the work sites, the barracks, the bodies, the corpses, the hunger, the roll call, the labor, the insanity, the fear, the despair, the strangeness, the hope, the cruelty — is captured in terrifyingly sharp detail.”

In conclusion, Debreczeni has written haunting conformation of the terror of that was the Holocaust, and the will to survive.

(Entrance to Auschwitz I)

MY FRIENDS by Hisham Matar

Muammar Gaddafi in Rome - 10 June 2009

(Libyan Dictator Muammar Qaddafi)

The history of Libya from 1969 which saw Colonel Muammar Qaddafi seize power through the 2011 Arab Spring that resulted in his demise was wrought with murder, torture, assassinations, persecution, terrorism, lack of freedom, poverty, and victimization to a cult of personality.  Those years produced many significant dates, all of which stand out for varying degrees of horror.  On April 17, 1984. a crowd of anti-Qaddafi demonstrators gathered across the street from the Libyan embassy in London.  During the demonstrations shots were fired from the embassy at demonstrators killing a London police officer and wounding 11 protestors.  On April 5, 1986, Qaddafi was deemed responsible for the terrorist attack on a West Berlin discotheque that killed three and injured 229.  Ten days later the United States retaliated striking military targets in Tripoli and Benghazi.  On December 21, 1988, two Libyan intelligence officers planted a bomb that  blew up Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland killing 243 passengers and 16 crew members.  On December 21, 2012, following the overthrow of Qaddafi an attack by Ansar al-Sharia on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulted in the death of US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and 3 others and injured 10.  This would lead to a partisan  congressional investigation that Republicans used to damage Hilliary Clinton’s presidential campaign.  It is clear that during these years Libya was not a place where free thought and democracy existed, and today remains a failed state.

Libyan author Hisham Matar’s latest novel, MY FRIENDS tackles this time period focusing on the 1984 London shooting as the emotional center of the story.  The book is narrated by a Libyan exile named Khaled Abd Hady, who left Benghazi in 1983 to study English literature at Edinburgh University and remained in London for thirty-two years.  Khaled had been one of the demonstrators on that 1984 day alongside two men who would become his closest friends, Hosam Zowa, a writer who had decided to live in San Francisco with his family before moving to Paris, London and other venues, and Mustafa al Touny, a fellow student at Edinburgh.  Matar, born in New York City to Libyan parents, and winner of the 2017 Pulitzer Prize for his memoir, THE RETURN, has authored a quiet novel that examines how the bonds of friendship are forged and fray over a lifetime.

Anti Gaddafi demonstrations outside the Libyan embassy, London 17th April 1984

(Libyan exiles demonstrating against the Qaddafi regime on April 17, 1984)

MY FRIENDS focuses on the relationship among three Libyan men whose lives intersect over more than three decades, from the mid-1980s through the aftermath of the 2011 Arab Spring that deposed Muammar Qaddafi after 42 years. The narrator, Khaled Abd al Hady, who left Libya to study English literature at the University of Edinburgh was inspired to pursue those studies by an enigmatic short story authored by Zowa, who vanished from the literary world after publishing a single story collection.

(It has been almost 40 years since Pc Yvonne Fletcher was murdered outside the Libyan Embassy. ‘She said, “good morning, what a beautiful day”, and five minutes later she was shot’) 

There are a number of themes that dominate the novel.  The concepts of liberation, exile, moral ambiguity, and friendship are all integrated into the story. Employing the musing of Khaled, Matar focuses on related themes asking the following; was it possible to live a happy life away from home, without one’s family?  Second, is it true that all one has to do to survive is to endure each day, and gradually, minute by minute, brick by brick, will time build a wall?  Third, What was it like to be a human being in a world where people are willing to crush each other?

These themes follow Khaled’s life for decades as he navigates the twin crises of exile and loneliness.  Matar follows the interactions of Khaled and Mustafa, following their emotional, intellectual, and political development.  Soon Hosam reappears out of nowhere which becomes the watershed moment in the novel.    We follow the lives of the three exiles in beautiful detail as Matar is an exceptional writer who knows how to construct meaningful dialogue and scenery.  Khaled will leave the university and wind up in London.  After a few years he travels to Paris to be with his friend Ranan who leaves Libya for brain surgery in Paris.  It is while he is in Paris that the man behind the desk at his hotel turns out to be Hosam rekindling their friendship.  Along with Mustafa, Hannah, Khaled’s girlfriend, and Claire, Hosam’s significant other they form an engaging group whose dialogue absorbs the reader’s attention as they lay out their personal beliefs and how it relates to events in their home country.

By 2011, the Arab Spring broke out in Tunisia and soon spread to Tahrir Square in Egypt, and Benghazi and Tripoli in Libya.  Mustafa who had been in exile for decades after witnessing the 1984 Embassy shooting cries at the possibility of ending Qaddafi’s tyranny and decides to return to Libya to fight for the emerging revolution.  Khaled, despite the urging of his friend, refuses to return and fight as he is still traumatized by the wounds suffered at the embassy shooting.  Matar creates many poignant scenes including Khaled’s father’s visit to convince him to return home, and Mustafa’s conversations with his mother as he fights for Qaddafi’s overthrow. 

muammar_qaddafi_closeup_AP111021125286.jpg

(Qaddafi’s body after being killed by Libyan revolutionaries)

Matar’s novel provides a vivid picture of Qaddafi’s rule which consisted of paranoia on the part of Libyan exiles living in Europe, and Libyan citizens who remained at home.  A tight fisted dictatorship evolved into a “cult of personality” that the Libyan people were forced to endure.  Torture, violence, harassment, loss of employment, poverty, assassinations in foreign counties were all elements of Qaddafi’s bag of tricks.  This background forms the basis of Khaled’s fear of returning home, Mustafa’s transformation into a revolutionary soldier, and Hosam’s off and on writing which is responsible for the origins of their friendship.

Other important characters are developed. Dr. Henry Walbrook, Khaled’s literature professor becomes his friend and confidant.  Mahammed Mustafa Ramada, the voice of the BBC Arabic World Service and journalist who read Hosam’s short story that fascinated and captured Khaled.  Hosam Rajab Zowa, Hosam’s father who had been a supporter of Qaddafi and believed the embassy shooting was correct.  What happens to these characters greatly impacts the lives of the three exiled friends.

Soldiers loyal to the head of Libya's Government of National Unity, Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah, sit in the back of a truck in Tripoli, Libya

(Fighting between the two most powerful factions in the capital could pose significant risks today, 2023)

Matar uses Hosam to present various literary ideas.  Being a bibliophile, my favorite comments include Hosam’s remarks that “there was no point in owning a book unless one intended to reread it multiple times.”  Further, he states “to have an endless number of books sit on the shelf just because one has read them or might one day read them is absurd.”  However, I agree with his final commentary on books “like Montaigne, you believe that the very presence of books in your room cultivates you, that books are not only to be read but to be lived with.” What Hosam secretly found troubling was not the sight of a large number of books but the stability that such an acquisition assumes, which for him was very difficult to accept.

Matar brings closure to his story as the Libyan chapter of the Arab Spring takes hold.  Khaled was afraid to return to Benghazi as he feared he would not be able to reconstitute his life, which had taken so long to accomplish after three decades in exile.  He was afraid he would lose the security, emotional grounding and dependable relationships he had developed which his parents could not understand, producing a great deal of guilt.  Mustafa did not suffer from these doubts as he returned and immediately joined revolutionary forces to fight to end Qaddafi’s tyranny.  Hosam on the other hand will return to bury his father and please his mother.  He still refuses to return to his writing and he falls in love as decides he must join the fight.

As Peter Baker writes in his New York Times book review Matar focus is on  “the experience of Libyans seeking safety in exile. Matar — himself one such exile — picks apart their psyches, analyzing at a microscopic level how violence and migration have altered how they think and feel and relate to the people closest to them. He has returned to this cluster of topics as if it’s a house he’s obsessed with, examining it from different angles, sneaking inside and finding new rooms, even new wings.”  “Readers encountering Matar for the first time will find in “My Friends” a masterly literary meditation on his lifelong themes. For those who already know his work, the effect is amplified tenfold. In the dark house Matar continues to explore, the rooms are full of echoes: The further in you go, the louder they get.”*

*Peter Baker, In ‘My Friends’ an Exile Finds Himself Outside Libya, but Never Far Away, New York Times, January 10, 2024.

(Libyan Dictator Mummar Qaddafi)

COLD VICTORY by Karl Marlantes

Russia Soviet Union Finland winter war ski patrol snow frozen soldiers

(Russian troops in Finland during WWII)

Russia has shaped twentieth century Finnish history due to the small nation’s proximity to the Slavic giant.  Before World War II, the Helsinki government found itself dealing with a Russian invasion, during the war it suffered Nazi occupation leading to a reinvasion from Moscow that at the end of the war saw it loose roughly 11% of its territory to its Stalinist neighbor.  Today Finland has reemerged as a pawn in Russia’s drive to recapture its empire.  After Finland obtained NATO membership, Russian President Vladimir Putin has threatened Finland and with its long border the Finnish government must be prepared for any eventuality as the war in Ukraine grinds on, and as Republicans in the House of Representatives continue to block any aid for the Kyiv government.  This landscape lends itself to a wonderful opportunity to create historical fiction involving the Russo-Finnish relationship.  Karl Marlantes, the author of MATTERHORN, one of the most profound and disturbing novels about Vietnam, and DEEP RIVER, a wonderful and engrossing work of historical fiction centered on the experience of Finnish immigrants in the logging area of Washington state at the turn of the century, has filled that gap with his latest book, COLD VICTORY.

Those familiar with Marlantes’ previous efforts will not be disappointed with his current effort.  Set in the heart of the emerging Cold War the Finns are caught between East and West trying to recover from the damage caused by World War II.  The most important characters in the novel include Arnie and Louise Koski, a married couple who have been posted to Helsinki.  Arnie is a Lieutenant Colonel in the US Army and has been appointed  military attaché to the US Legation.  Louise is a rather clueless “diplomatic” spouse who creates a number of issues for her husband and will learn many difficult lessons.  Mikhail and Natalya Bobrov are in a comparable situation.  Mikhail is the Russian military attaché in Helsinki and Natalya works at the Russian Legation.  She develops a strong friendship with Louise as do their husbands, as  both spies engage in intense competition with each other.  Kaarina Varila, a Finnish relative of Arnie, and the Head of a Helsinki orphanage is emblematic of Finnish hatred of the Russians.  Other individuals include Colonel Oleg Sokolov who is in charge of Soviet security in Finland as part of the MGB – the Ministry of State Security which is considered worse than the Gestapo.  Sokolov is a sinister individual who is like a spider spinning his web of intrigue.  Max Hamilton is the US Charge d’ Affaires at the US legation and Aleksandr Abramov is the Soviet Envoy.

Soviet Union Russia Finland winter war soldiers snow

(This is a Finnish light artillery squad on patrol duty in the Karelian Isthmus on January 3, 1940. Using white tunics over their heavy winter clothing to camouflage themselves, the soldiers took on the appearance of ghosts as they travel over the snow covered terrain) 

Marlantes integrates a number of important historical characters in his story.  Those who stand out are Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin whose motivations and realpolitik are on full display.  Another is Lavrentiy Beria, Head of the MGB, and a man who strikes fear in all who come in contact with him.  These and other characters highlight the author’s strong command of the history of the period.  Further, he integrates a number of notable events and observations into his plot.  Useful examples include a discussion of the Katyn Forest Massacre in 1943 as Beria ordered the murder of 22,000 Polish officers, and the history surrounding the 1944 Moscow Armistice whereby Finland was forced to pay a massive reparation to Russia and turn over a substantial amount of territory.

The story centers around Russian paranoia concerning Finland who they view as a threat to their security as a western invasion route against Moscow.  The US on the other hand is worried about communist influence in the Finnish Parliament as they hold over one-third of the seats in addition to the presence of Soviet troops.  Marlantes has created a espionage plot centered on raising funds for a Finnish orphanage which Louisa and Natalya work to support as they are heartbroken by the number of orphans that were created because of  World War II.  Second, the story is played out by the competition between Arnie and Mikhail who have challenged each other with a grueling ten day 300K ski race from the Artic Circle to Kuopio.  The race became a metaphor for the competition between capitalism and communism and a pawn in the developing Cold War between the Soviets and Americans and should Mikhail lose the race the Stalinist regime would probably kill or exile him and his family to Siberia as he would be viewed as a spy and an embarrassment to Moscow.

(Karl Marlantes, author)

In developing the relationships among his characters, Marlantes juxtaposes the differences between the Soviet Union and United States, how both powers viewed the recent war, and their current distrust of each other as relations continued to deteriorate.  The question in the background rests on trust, as each character seems to question the loyalty of those they deal with, not knowing who might be spying on whom.  Marlantes uses Sokolov’s past life and current role as a vehicle to highlight the suffering of the Russian people during the war because of the Nazi invasion and a justification for its own invasion of Finland.  Now that the Nazis are defeated his role is to root out internal enemies of the motherland and employ all the weapons of the Stalinist system – a system that fills the world with disinformation and deceit.

For Marlantes whether writing about Vietnam or post-war Finland, war is a confusing and rich world where death and bureaucratic stupidity abound.  If one where to think about events in Ukraine today there is a similarity to what happened to Finland after the war.  The significant difference is Ukraine has received enormous amount of western aid, and Finland did not.  Marlantes has written a tight Cold War novel that draws the reader in and does not let them go until the book is read from cover to cover.

Russia Finland Helsinki winter war bombing trenches damage

(War between Finland and Soviet Russia started 22.45 o’clock (M.E.T.) on November 30, 1939. Trenches which were dug at the beginning of the Finnish-Russian tension in Helsinki, December 1, 1939) 

THE WIZARD OF THE KREMLIN: A NOVEL by Giuliano Da Empoli

Moscow Kremlin

(The Kremlin, Moscow)

Since February 2022 when Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine a plethora of books have been published or reissued that deal with the mindset of Russian President Vladimir Putin.  The most important include works by  Philip Short, Steven Lee Myers, Catherine Belton, Masha Gessen, Mark Galeotti, Owen Matthews, Luke Harding, Christopher Miller, Serhii Plokhy, Angela Stent, Shaun Walker, and Samuel Ramani.  These authors explore Putin’s rise to power, his Pan-Slavism ideology designed to restore the Kremlin to its previous world power status, his domestic agenda, and the reason behind his invasion of Ukraine.  These monographs are works of non-fiction and rely on intensive research that includes interviews with the relevant personages and scouring available documentation to foster insights and critical viewpoints.  Turning to the fictional genre it has a recent addition to this subject matter with the publication of THE WIZARD OF THE KREMLIN: A NOVEL by Giuliano Da Empoli that attempts to explain Putin’s realpolitik and other aspects of his reign employing the format of a novel.

The central character in Da Empoli’s work is Vadim Baranov, a lover of literature, also known as “the wizard of the Kremlin” who was a television producer before becoming Putin’s political advisor.  After fifteen years at Putin’s side, Baranov decides to escape Putin’s grasp and explain the inner workings of the Russian state where Putin’s sycophants and oligarchs battle for the attention of the Russian Tsar.  Russia finds itself in a dark place because of Baranov’s work as the Kremlin “spin doctor.”  Baranov is ensconced in a system he helped create but realizes he must leave – not an easy thing to accomplish in Putin’s Russia.

Russian President Vladimir Putin  at a ceremony to mark the 75th anniversary of Russian Federal Medical-Biological Agency in Moscow on Nov. 9, 2022.

(Russian President, Vladimir Putin)

Da Empoli conveys his story by employing Baranov as a conduit for the narrator of the novel.  The novel opens with an unnamed narrator visiting Moscow to research the early 20th century writer, Yevgeny Zamyatin.  It turns out that Baranov is an admirer of the novelist and through social media the narrator visits Baranov in his remote country house.  As the novel evolves Baranov shares his life story with his visitor moving with energy through Russia in the 1990s to the invasion of Ukraine.

As the Soviet Union comes to an end in 1991 it appears that Russia may be on the verge of some sort of democratic edifice with the end of censorship and a new cultural freedom.  As we know this did not come to pass and Baranov, who resented the new intelligentsia realizes that the future will belong to more practical individuals as a result he will join Putin as a political/media advisor and consummate insider.  In this capacity Da Empoli relates Putin’s rise to power and through dialogue with the Russian autocrat he explains in rather crude form his view of power, how it should be used, and what it can accomplish – the restoration of Russia as a force in the world.

uktrial1118

(Russian oligarch, Boris Berezovsky)

Da Emploi’s fictional account borders on reality as he weaves in historical events and characters into his novel.  We are witnessed to Putin’s actions and reactions to the sinking of a Russian submarine in the Barents Sea in which the entire crew drowned; terrorist attacks by Chechen rebels that some believe was carried out by the FSB; employing Putin’s large labrador in a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, knowing her fear of dogs, among many other examples.  Influential figures appear and reappear.  Oligarchs such as Boris Berezovsky, a billionaire who for a time owned ORT the main Russian television station; Mikhail Khodorkovsky, an opposition activist who had owed Yukos, the largest Russian energy company; Igor Sechin, Putin’s Deputy Chief of Staff and energy issues who would eventually take over Yukos; Yevgeny Prigozhin, a gangster who became Putin’s caterer and eventually opponent, and other important individuals.

(Igor Sechin, Putin’s Chief of Staff)

Da Empoli employs a sarcastic sense of humor and a great deal of irony in carrying out his plot as he compares the old Soviet state to the nouveaux riche of the new Russia.  Through Baranov’s autobiography the author offers interesting comparisons of Joseph Stalin and Putin, and descriptions of Russia in the 1990s when it seemed to be on the cusp of some sort of democracy with the present autocracy.  Da Empoli explains the need of the Russian people for stability and unity after the chaos of the 1990s – for Putin this could only be accomplished through raw power, never admitting an error, appealing to Russian nationalism by calling for a restoration of its Soviet Empire, interfering with the internal mechanism of western democracy, and never giving in to those who oppose him.

The author is right on as he parrots Putin’s critique of Russian docility toward the west under Boris Yeltsin.  As Baranov recounts “our docility called for the harshest punishment.  NATO flooded into the Baltic States, and American military bases into central Asia.  The oversight of financial institutions was no longer sufficient; now they wanted to take power directly.  Send us back to the basement and replace us with agents of the CIA and the International Monetary Fund.  First in Georgia, then in Ukraine, the very heart of our lost Empire.”  For Putin, American actions in Ukrainian elections and its move toward the European Union and NATO was the last straw resulting in the invasion.

The book is ostensibly about cunning and the manipulation of reality as Baranov, a wonderful storyteller that the reader falls under his spell.  Baranov uses his prowess of creating a new reality, a vision of Russian specialness, a new national myth, and cultivates grievances against the west carrying out Putin’s mission.  Da Empoli has created an important character to carry out his novel in Baranov, a cynic who possesses sharp political analysis.  His character is loosely based on Vladislav Surkov, a politician and strategist whose Machiavellian approach to politics made him a perfect advisor for Putin as he accompanied him from St. Petersburg to the Kremlin.  The novel succeeds as a work of fiction, but its origin in reality makes you shudder as you read on.

(The Kremlin, Moscow)

NAPOLEON: A LIFE by Adam Zamoyski

French general and emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

According to British historian Munro Price over 200,000 books have been written about Napoleon Bonaparte.  There is a fascination with the French dictator that historians have addressed for over two centuries, and currently Hollywood has produced its own version of Napoleon.  Today the most recognized biographies of Napoleon are written by British historians that include the three volume work of Michael Broers, and the single volume by Andrew Roberts which approaches 1000 pages.  Obviously, if one is to put pen to paper concerning Napoleon, the result will be a rather long monograph.  One of the latest contributions to the Napoleon genre is by Polish historian, Adam Zamoyski entitled, NAPOLEON: A LIFE though shorter than Roberts’ work by 250 pages it is a comprehensive look at the French leader that digs a little deeper into his thought process and ultimate decision making than previous works.

Zamoyski has written a thorough and workmanlike biography focusing on Napoleon’s personal life, domestic issues and relationships, his ideology, domestic and foreign threats to his reign, along with insights and details pertaining to the battlefield and the diplomatic movements of the period.  In doing so the reader should acquire an intimate knowledge of Napoleon – what made him tick, what was his belief system, and determine his place in history.

François Gérard (1770-1837), Portrait of Josephine de Beauharnais, 1801, oil on canvas,... Josephine Bonaparte’s Gardens at Malmaison

(François Gérard (1770-1837), Portrait of Josephine de Beauharnais, 1801, oil on canvas, 178 x 174 cm/70 x 68.5 in. Hermitage Museum, Russia)

What sets Zamoyski’s work apart is the context that he places his subject.  According to the author Napoleon should be seen as “a visible symptom of the sickness of the times, and as such bore the blame for the sins of all.”  Zamoyski argues that Napoleon did exhibit extraordinary qualities, but in many ways was quite ordinary.  To credit Napoléon as a genius for his many victories, overlooks the worst disaster in military history as he single-handedly destroyed the great enterprise he took years to create. Undoubtedly he was a brilliant tactician, but he was no strategist, as his miserable end attests to.  Further, Zamoyski argues that Napoleon was not an “evil monster.”  He was selfish, violent, and egocentric, but there is no evidence that he inflicted suffering needlessly.  His motives  and ambition are akin to Alexander I, Wellington, Nelson, Metternich, Blucher, Bernadotte and others whose careers adjoined Napoleon.  In addition, if one examines British actions in India, Canada, and Egypt; Austrian measures in Poland and Italy; Prussian activities in East and Central Europe; and Russian movements across Central Asia, one should conclude he was nothing more than the embodiment of his age.  Throughout the monograph Zamoyski develops these themes and integrates a great deal of Napoleon’s personal life and beliefs.

MARIE-LOUISE OF AUSTRIA

(Empress Marie-Louise, by François Gérard 1810 © Louvre Museum)

According to Zamoyski, Napoleon’s Corsican lineage plays a significant role in his emotional development and worldview due to how the French government treated his family and the Corsican people in general.  As the French Revolution evolved into the “Reign of Terror” and the authoritarian rule of the Directory and the European wars that ensued Napoleon learned that the rules of chivalry did not apply, and only winning mattered.  Zamoyski argues that “the dreamy romanticism of his youth had been confronted with the seamy side of human affairs, and at the age of twenty-four he had emerged a cynical realist ready to make his way in the increasingly dangerous world in which he was obliged to live.”

Zamoyski’s portrayal does an excellent job recounting Napoleon’s relationships with Josephine de Beauharnais who he married in 1805 and divorced in 1810, and Marie-Louise, the Habsburg Archduchess who took her place.  The detail is striking, providing insight into Napoleon’s emotional state and his genuine love and caring for both women.  At times Zamoyski goes overboard as he relates Josephine’s numerous affairs and Napoleon’s adolescent love for Marie-Louise. 

Along with the women in his life Napoleon’s family is placed under a microscope, particularly his brothers.  First, Lucien, a rather egoistic individual in his own right who helped Napoleon become First Consul during the Brumaire Coup and then lived his life according to his own needs rather than conforming to his brother’s wishes.  Second, Joseph who believed he should have been the French Emperor, not his brother who reigned in Italy and later made a mess of his rule in Spain – a rather incompetent individual.  Third, Jerome, a total military failure, and lastly, Louis, Napoleon’s favorite who would deal with psychological issues and became king of Holland but angered his brother when he refused to support the Continental system.

Charles Maurice de Talleyrand Périgord (1754–1838), Prince de Bénévent, baron François Gérard (French, Rome 1770–1837 Paris), Oil on canvas

(Charles Maurice de Talleyrand)

A key component in understanding Napoleon’s mindset is his approach to diplomacy which for him was an extension of the battlefield.  Zamoyski’s nimbly account recounts Napoleon’s negotiations and relationships with Austrian Chancellor and former ambassador to France, Klement von Metternich, Russian Tsar, Alexander I, Charles Habsburg, Holy Roman Emperor, and French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand who initially supported Napoleon, but turned against him when he believed the Emperor’s expansionist policies went too far. Zamoyski integrates many other key figures into the monograph that includes lesser royal figures, French generals, Russian, English, Prussian, and Austrian figures.  In reading Zamoyski’s account it conforms to A. J. P. Taylor’s classic THE STRUGGLE FOR THE MASTERY OF EUROPE, 1815-1848.

One can draw many insights from Zamoyski’s analysis as he argues that Napoleon was a dichotomy in that he felt insecure next to the monarchs of Europe because he lacked their “bloodlines,” as he referred to himself as  “parvenue.”  On the other hand, he saw himself as a supreme leader creating his own emperorship defeating the monarchies that he compared himself to.  Zamoyski does a wonderful job describing the Napoleon-Alexander I relationship as the French autocrat had little respect for the Russian monarch but grew to respect him as he ultimately could not bend Alexander to his will despite professions of love and respect.  Other important insights involve the opposition to Napoleon in France from Jacobins and Royalists.  A number of coups are discussed, and it is clear in Napoleon’s mind that the only way to remain popular and maintain domestic support was to keep delivering victories on the battlefield as opposed to obtaining peace.  For Napoleon war was the tool to tamp down unrest in the military and domestic sphere no matter how much opposition he encountered.

(Klement von Metternich)

Zamoyski relies a great deal on previous research particularly, Napoleon’s invasion of Russia.  His decision making and battlefield conduct are laid out clearly as he quotes from his previous book, 1812: NAPOLEON’S FATAL MARCH ON MOSCOW. Particularly interesting is Napoleon’s admission that invading Russia was a grievous error –  a rare confession. One of the highlights of Zamoyski’s work is his reliance on Napoleon’s remarkable correspondence, personal reflections, and notes left by those close to him to create an exceptional portrait of the French Emperor.

(Alexander I)

Zamoyski’s depiction of Napoleon is enhanced as he tackles his domestic program.  The Code de Napoleon, the Concordat with the Papacy, and his educational system are well known, but reflect interests apart from the conduct of war. However, relying on Napoleon’s letters as he describes his cultural interests, his plans for museums, opera houses, wide boulevards and other cultural and architectural projects allowing the reader to acquire a sense of Napoleon’s desires, not only to conquer and spread his “continental system” throughout Europe, but also to encourage and foster intellectual pursuits.

Zamoyski’s achievement in this book is to bring to life Napoleon as a person, not just a military leader, and political ruler.  He describes a man who viewed the world through the lens of a game of chess, and people, religion, morality, affections, and other interests as pawns in a game where pieces needed to be moved and used as the situation called for.  To Zamoyski’s credit his monograph is eminently readable and deeply researched making it an important contribution to  Napoleonic literature.

Jacques-Louis David: The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries